Cost-Effectiveness of long-term tolvaptan administration for chronic heart failure treatment in Japan
Yasuhisa Nakao1, Hiroshi Kawakami1, Makoto Saito2
1Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, Nephrology and Hypertension, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan.
Background:
Tolvaptan (TLV) is effective for acute heart failure (HF) with congestion, but its long-term administration in patients with chronic HF (CHF) remains controversial. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment has not yet been investigated. Thus, we sought to validate the cost-effectiveness of TLV for CHF treatment in Japan.
Methods:
A Markov model was developed to compare total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between long-term TLV strategy and the standard strategy using furosemide for CHF. The target population included 75-year-old patients with CHF. The effectiveness of the TLV strategy for CHF treatment was determined based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. We used a 10-year horizon, with sensitivity analyses for significant variables and a scenario analysis for patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide (≥60 mg per day).
Results:
In the base case analysis, the total cost of the long-term TLV strategy was higher than that of the standard strategy (¥3,243,779 vs. ¥1,179,964). The total QALYs of the long-term TLV strategy were lower than those of the standard strategy (4.52 vs 4.59). Thus, a standard TLV prescription for CHF treatment has no clinical or economic benefit. In the scenario analysis (i.e. in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide), the long-term TLV strategy was more effective (total QALYs, 5.10 vs. 4.41) but more expensive (total costs, ¥3,540,558 vs. ¥1,272,208) than the standard strategy. The ICER of the TLV strategy against the standard strategy (¥3,289,579/QALY) was below the willingness-to-pay of ¥5,000,000, which suggests that the long-term TLV strategy is cost-effective relative to the standard strategy in patients with CHF receiving high-dose furosemide.
Conclusions:
Long-term TLV administration did not provide a clear benefit for all patients with CHF. However, this treatment strategy may be a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients who require high-dose furosemide.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions


