Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock
Danilo Obradovic1, Anne Freund1, Hans-Josef Feistritzer1
1Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Insights
Cardiogenic shock (CS) management is improving, but mortality remains high. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices offer potential benefits, yet further research is needed to confirm their impact on CS patient survival.
Area of Science:
- Acute cardiovascular medicine
- Critical care cardiology
Background:
- Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition with persistently high mortality rates despite therapeutic advancements.
- Expert CS centers and standardized protocols are recommended for optimal patient management.
- Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are increasingly utilized for low cardiac output states.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for cardiogenic shock.
- To focus on the current state and evidence for contemporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in CS.
- To identify future research directions for MCS in CS.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on cardiogenic shock diagnosis and treatment.
- Analysis of contemporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices.
- Evaluation of existing scientific evidence regarding MCS application in CS.
Main Results:
- Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are increasingly used in CS, aiming to improve circulation.
- Despite increased utilization, large randomized controlled trials confirming mortality reduction with MCS in CS are lacking.
- Further research is essential to fully establish the clinical value of MCS in CS patients.
Conclusions:
- Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) represents a key therapeutic option in cardiogenic shock (CS) management.
- Robust evidence from randomized controlled trials is still needed to confirm the survival benefit of MCS in CS.
- Continued research is crucial to optimize the application and understand the full potential of MCS in CS.
Abstract:
Cardiogenic shock (CS) represents one of the foremost concerns in the field of acute cardiovascular medicine. Despite major advances in treatment, mortality of CS remains high. International societies recommend the development of expert CS centers with standardized protocols for CS diagnosis and treatment. In these terms, devices for temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be used to support the compromised circulation and could improve clinical outcome in selected patient populations presenting with CS. In the past years, we have witnessed an immense increase in the utilization of MCS devices to improve the clinical problem of low cardiac output. Although some treatment guidelines include the use of temporary MCS up to now no large randomized controlled trial confirmed a reduction in mortality in CS patients after MCS and additional research evidence is necessary to fully comprehend the clinical value of MCS in CS. In this article, we provide an overview of the most important diagnostic and therapeutic modalities in CS with the main focus on contemporary MCS devices, current state of art and scientific evidence for its clinical application and outline directions of future research efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Pressure Imbalances and Circulatory Shock
Blood Pressure: Hypertension and Hypotension
Normal blood pressure is 120/80 mm Hg. Elevated blood pressure is 120-129/under 80 mm Hg. Hypertension, warranting treatment at 130/80 mm Hg, is often asymptomatic and can lead to severe cardiovascular events, aneurysms, peripheral arterial disease, chronic renal disease, or cardiac...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

