Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Characterization of Recombination Effects in a Liquid Ionization Chamber Used for the Dosimetry of a Radiosurgical Accelerator
Published on: May 9, 2014
Comparing the dosimeter-specific corrections for influence quantities of some parallel-plate ionization chambers in
Hamid Reza Baghani1, Mostafa Robatjazi2, Stefano Andreoli3
1Physics Department, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran.
Abstract:
The performance characteristics of some widely employed parallel-plate ionization chambers in dosimetry of conventional high energy electron beams were evaluated and compared in the present study following the recommendations of the IAEA TRS-398 reference dosimetry protocol. Three different types of PTW-made parallel-plate ionization chambers including Roos (TM34001), Markus (TM23343), and Advanced Markus (TM34045) were employed, and correction factors for polarity (kpol), recombination (ks), and quality conversion factor ( [Formula: see text] ) were determined at different nominal electron energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV produced by a Varian Trilogy clinical Linac. All measurements were performed inside a MP3-M automatic water phantom in the reference condition of 100 cm SSD (source to surface distance), reference measurement depth (zref), and 10 × 10 cm2 field size at the phantom surface. The maximum and minimum range of kpol deviations from unity were respectively found for Markus and Roos ionization chambers. The maximum ks values also belonged to the Markus ionization chamber, while the minimum ks values were observed for the Advanced Markus chamber. The measured ks values through recommendations of the TRS-398 dosimetry protocol were in good accordance with those obtained by Jaffe-plot analysis for all considered ionization chambers. The type of employed ionization chamber can minimally affect the measured electron beam quality index (R50), while it can have a more considerable impact on [Formula: see text] value, especially in the case of the Markus chamber. From the results, it can be concluded that the Roos and Advanced Markus ionization chambers have a superior performance in the case of electron beam dosimetry, although all considered ionization chambers fulfilled the criteria requested by relevant reference dosimetry protocols.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Biological Effects of Radiation
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
The atomizer used in AAS can be either a flame atomizer or an...
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Principle
The ions and electrons produced interact with the fluctuating magnetic field created by a water-cooled...
Inductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry (ICP–MS): Overview

