Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

08:27
Novel Triple-Loop Technique for Suturing TFCC Injuries without Transosseous Tunnel
Published on: May 23, 2025
328
Le Fort I osteotomy and soft tissue response: A retrospective cohort study comparing three different techniques
Ariane P S Gil1, Agustin Machado-Fernández1, Raquel Guijarro-Martínez2
1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery PhD Student at Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Summary
Subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy minimizes changes to the nasolabial region compared to conventional techniques. This cone beam computed tomography study found subspinal osteotomy preferable for preserving soft tissue aesthetics after maxillary advancement.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Orthognathic Surgery
- 3D Imaging in Dentistry
Background:
- Le Fort I osteotomy is a common surgical procedure for correcting midface discrepancies.
- Understanding the impact of different osteotomy techniques on nasolabial soft tissues is crucial for aesthetic outcomes.
- Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers advanced 3D visualization for evaluating surgical changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of three Le Fort I osteotomy techniques on nasolabial soft tissues.
- To evaluate changes in inter-alar width and alar base width using 3D CBCT analysis.
- To determine which technique best preserves the nasolabial region's aesthetics.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study involving 90 patients divided into three groups: conventional Le Fort I, subspinal Le Fort I, and conventional Le Fort I with ANS recontouring.
- CBCT scans were taken before surgery (T0) and 6 months post-surgery (T1).
- Three-dimensional surface analysis was used to measure changes in nasolabial soft tissues.
Main Results:
- All techniques resulted in significant changes to the nasolabial area (P < 0.001).
- Subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy showed statistically significant smaller mean changes in inter-alar width (1.20 mm) and alar base width (0.85 mm) compared to conventional techniques.
- Conventional Le Fort I with ANS recontouring showed intermediate changes.
Conclusions:
- Subspinal Le Fort I osteotomy appears to be the preferred technique when minimizing alterations in the nasolabial region is a priority.
- CBCT is a valuable tool for assessing 3D soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.
- Further research may explore long-term stability and patient-reported outcomes.

