Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

63.4K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
63.4K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

161
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
161
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

61.8K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
61.8K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Natural and Artificial Concepts01:24

Natural and Artificial Concepts

303
In psychology, concepts can be divided into two categories: natural and artificial. Natural concepts are formed through direct or indirect experiences. For example, consider the concept of snow. If you live in a place with regular snowfall, such as Essex Junction, Vermont, you know snow through direct experiences. You’ve seen it fall, touched it, shoveled it, and played in it. You recognize its texture, appearance, and even its smell. In contrast, if you live on an island like Saint...
303
Classification of Systems-I01:26

Classification of Systems-I

358
Linearity is a system property characterized by a direct input-output relationship, combining homogeneity and additivity.
Homogeneity dictates that if an input x(t) is multiplied by a constant c, the output y(t) is multiplied by the same constant. Mathematically, this is expressed as:
358

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thin Objects Are Not Transparent.

Theoria·2024
Same author

How to approximate fuzzy sets: mind-changes and the Ershov Hierarchy.

Synthese·2023
Same author

Computability theory as a <i>philosophical</i> achievement.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2022
Same author

Classifying equivalence relations in the Ershov hierarchy.

Archive for mathematical logic·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K

On logicality and natural logic.

Salvatore Pistoia-Reda1, Luca San Mauro2

  • 1Departament de Traducció i Ciències del Llenguatge, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Natural Language Semantics
|November 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study explores language logicality, suggesting meaning modulation of nonlogical terms offers a better explanation than assuming a natural logic system. Evidence from acceptable contradictions and tautologies supports this view.

Keywords:
Acceptable analyticitiesFunctional vs. nonfunctional vocabularyLanguage logicalityMeaning modulationTrivialityUngrammaticality

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.3K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.3K
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.9K

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics
  • Philosophy of Language
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The concept of language logicality posits a deductive device within the language system to filter analytic constructions.
  • Acceptable contradictions and tautologies present puzzling evidence challenging standard linguistic theories of logicality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate alternative accounts of language logicality.
  • To challenge the prevailing assumption of a natural logic system in language processing.
  • To provide evidence supporting meaning modulation of nonlogical terms.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of linguistic data, focusing on acceptable contradictions and tautologies.
  • Critique of existing models that rely on skeletons versus standard logical forms.
  • Development of theoretical arguments for meaning modulation.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests that language logicality can be explained without recourse to a stipulated natural logic.
  • Meaning modulation of nonlogical terms provides a viable alternative framework.
  • The standard model's reliance on skeletons is questioned.

Conclusions:

  • Alternative accounts of language logicality, emphasizing meaning modulation, are supported.
  • The necessity of a stipulated natural logic for explaining linguistic phenomena is rejected.
  • Future research should explore the mechanisms of meaning modulation in nonlogical terms.