Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional
Fariha Naz1, Abdul Samad Khan2, Mohammed Abdul Kader1
1Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 62521, Saudi Arabia.
Purpose:
The physical and mechanical performance of a newly commercialized dental restorative material (alkasite) was compared with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and nano-hybrid composite.
Methodology:
Human extracted premolars were used to investigate the shear bond strength. Restorative materials were placed on the dentine surface and were aged in deionized water for 14 days. The 3-D surface roughness was evaluated before and after chewing simulation cycles (50,000). The samples were fatigued mechanically using a chewing simulator and investigated with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Results:
For shear bond strength, alkasite showed significantly high values than GIC, whereas non-significant difference was observed between alkasite and nano-hybrid composite. After the chewing simulation (50,000 cycles), non-significant difference was found between GIC and nano-hybrid composite, where surface roughness values were highest for GIC and lowest for alkasite.
Conclusion:
The newly developed restorative material (alkasite) has shown better results than existing restorative materials.
Related Concept Videos
Mortar Properties
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Soundness of Cement

