Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Changes in post-keratoplasty astigmatism after suture removal: refraction vs tomography vs aberrometry
Suraj Kumar Chaurasiya1, Jagadesh C Reddy2, Pravin K Vaddavalli2
1Brien Holden School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, L V Prasad Eye Institute (LVPEI), Hyderabad 500034, India.
Aim:
To analyse the changes in magnitude and orientation of astigmatism after suture removal (SR) in keratoplasty eyes as measured by refraction, tomography, and aberrometry.
Methods:
Twenty-six eyes of 25 patients after optical keratoplasty requiring SR to reduce the astigmatism during the follow-up period were prospectively included. Eyes with poor quality topography scans or if there were no sutures in the steepest semi meridian were excluded. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, corneal tomography and aberrometry were performed on all patients before and after SR.
Results:
The mean age of the patients was 40.8±14.4y. Penetrating keratoplasty was performed in 23 eyes (89%) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was done in 3 eyes (11%). There was a statistically significant reduction in the magnitude of refractive, tomographic and aberrometry astigmatism after SR (P<0.001) at 2h after suture removal. The mean net reduction of the astigmatism was greater as measured by corneal tomography compared to refractive astigmatism (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant change in refractive astigmatism between 2h and 2mo after SR (P=0.55). Vector calculations demonstrated a greater amount of undercorrection in the tomography group and the rotational error was more towards counterclockwise direction. Mean monocular logMAR CDVA improved from 0.57 D to 0.49 D after SR (P=0.002).
Conclusion:
The net reduction in the magnitude of astigmatism after SR is greater in the tomography and aberrometry groups. With one episode of SR, there is no difference in the aberration profile.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
05:56Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016