Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Natural Products for the Management of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Special Focus on Nanoparticles Based
Rajeev K Singla1,2, Chandragiri Siva Sai3, Hitesh Chopra4
1Frontiers Science Center for Disease-related Molecular Network, Institutes for Systems Genetics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Abstract:
Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer among men and the second most frequent cause of cancer-related mortality around the world. The progression of advanced prostate cancer to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) plays a major role in disease-associated morbidity and mortality, posing a significant therapeutic challenge. Resistance has been associated with the activation of androgen receptors via several mechanisms, including alternative dehydroepiandrosterone biosynthetic pathways, other androgen receptor activator molecules, oncogenes, and carcinogenic signaling pathways. Tumor microenvironment plays a critical role not only in the cancer progression but also in the drug resistance. Numerous natural products have shown major potential against particular or multiple resistance pathways as shown by in vitro and in vivo studies. However, their efficacy in clinical trials has been undermined by their unfavorable pharmacological properties (hydrophobic molecules, instability, low pharmacokinetic profile, poor water solubility, and high excretion rate). Nanoparticle formulations can provide a way out of the stalemate, employing targeted drug delivery, improved pharmacokinetic drug profile, and transportation of diagnostic and therapeutic agents via otherwise impermeable biological barriers. This review compiles the available evidence regarding the use of natural products for the management of CRPC with a focus on nanoparticle formulations. PubMed and Google Scholar search engines were used for preclinical studies, while ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed were searched for clinical studies. The results of our study suggest the efficacy of natural compounds such as curcumin, resveratrol, apigenin, quercetin, fisetin, luteolin, kaempferol, genistein, berberine, ursolic acid, eugenol, gingerol, and ellagic acid against several mechanisms leading to castration resistance in preclinical studies, but fail to set the disease under control in clinical studies. Nanoparticle formulations of curcumin and quercetin seem to increase their potential in clinical settings. Using nanoparticles based on betulinic acid, capsaicin, sintokamide A, niphatenones A and B, as well as atraric acid seems promising but needs to be verified with preclinical and clinical studies.
Insights
Natural compounds show promise against castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in early studies. Nanoparticle formulations may improve their clinical effectiveness, overcoming challenges with drug delivery and efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Prostate cancer progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) presents a significant therapeutic challenge.
- Mechanisms of resistance involve androgen receptor activation and tumor microenvironment factors.
- Natural products show preclinical efficacy but face clinical limitations due to poor pharmacokinetic properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evidence on natural products for CRPC management, focusing on nanoparticle formulations.
- To assess the potential of natural compounds and their nanodelivery systems in overcoming CRPC resistance.
Main Methods:
- Literature search of preclinical and clinical studies using PubMed and Google Scholar.
- Focused review on natural products and their nanoparticle formulations for CRPC.
- Analysis of evidence regarding mechanisms of action and clinical translation.
Main Results:
- Numerous natural compounds demonstrated efficacy against CRPC resistance mechanisms in preclinical studies.
- Clinical efficacy of these compounds is limited by poor pharmacological properties.
- Nanoparticle formulations of curcumin and quercetin show potential for improved clinical outcomes.
- Other natural product nanoparticles (betulinic acid, capsaicin, etc.) show promise but require further investigation.
Conclusions:
- Natural products offer a promising avenue for CRPC treatment, but their clinical application is hindered by delivery challenges.
- Nanoparticle technology is crucial for enhancing the bioavailability and therapeutic potential of natural compounds against CRPC.
- Further preclinical and clinical validation of nanocarrier-based natural products is warranted.

