Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A RAND Appropriateness Panel Approach
Alastair G Proudfoot1,2,3,4, Antonis Kalakoutas4, Susanna Meade5
1Perioperative Medicine Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (A.G.P., M.J.D.G.).
Expert consensus on cardiogenic shock care shows alignment with guidelines, but identifies uncertainties in fluid administration and mechanical support, underscoring the need for more randomized trials in managing this critical condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Critical Care Medicine
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Current cardiogenic shock management relies on expert opinion and guidelines due to limited high-quality randomized trial data.
- An international panel aimed to identify areas of uncertainty in optimal patient management for cardiogenic shock.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine expert consensus on various aspects of cardiogenic shock patient care.
- To identify specific areas of uncertainty in current cardiogenic shock management practices.
Main Methods:
- A modified Delphi process involving an 18-person multidisciplinary international expert panel.
- A RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology survey with iterative rating of 70 statements on a 1-9 scale.
- Anonymous surveys followed by group discussions and re-surveys to reach consensus.
Main Results:
- Broad agreement was found with existing international guidelines and consensus statements.
- 44 statements were rated appropriate, 19 uncertain, and 7 inappropriate, with no significant disagreement.
- Routine fluid administration was deemed inappropriate; uncertainties included pre-PCI interventions, right heart catheterization, LV unloading, and futility markers for mechanical support.
Conclusions:
- Expert consensus largely aligns with current cardiogenic shock guidelines.
- Significant clinical equipoise exists in several key areas of cardiogenic shock management.
- Further randomized controlled trials are crucial to guide optimal patient management and decision-making in cardiogenic shock.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Angina IV: Management

