Differences in Fosfomycin Resistance Mechanisms between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales

Dina Zheng1, Phillip J Bergen2, Cornelia B Landersdorfer2

  • 1University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Insights

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a significant public health threat. Understanding fosfomycin resistance mechanisms in P. aeruginosa is crucial for effective treatment, as current breakpoints extrapolated from E. coli are unreliable.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of difficult-to-treat nosocomial infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs).
  • Fosfomycin, an older antibiotic with a unique mechanism of action, is being reconsidered for treating MDR pathogens.
  • Clinical use of fosfomycin for P. aeruginosa is hindered by a lack of specific susceptibility breakpoints and understanding of resistance mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and update the identified mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in P. aeruginosa.
  • To contrast these mechanisms with those found in Enterobacterales.
  • To emphasize the unsuitability of extrapolating susceptibility breakpoints from E. coli to P. aeruginosa.

Main Methods:

  • Narrative review of current literature on fosfomycin resistance mechanisms.
  • Focus on resistance mechanisms specific to P. aeruginosa, including peptidoglycan recycling enzymes, chromosomal Fos enzymes, and transporter mutations.
  • Summary and comparison of resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales, such as plasmid-mediated enzymes and murA modification.

Main Results:

  • P. aeruginosa exhibits distinct fosfomycin resistance mechanisms, including alterations in peptidoglycan recycling and chromosomal Fos enzymes.
  • Resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales involve transporters, plasmid-mediated enzymes, and murA modifications.
  • Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms can lead to different minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in P. aeruginosa compared to Enterobacterales.

Conclusions:

  • Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms in P. aeruginosa differ from those in Enterobacterales.
  • Extrapolating susceptibility breakpoints from E. coli to P. aeruginosa is not supported by current evidence and should be avoided.
  • Further research is needed to establish reliable clinical breakpoints for fosfomycin in P. aeruginosa infections.