Introduction of a standardized protocol for cardiac risk assessment in candidates for liver transplant - A

Killian J McCarthy1, Daniel Motta-Calderon2, Alisson Estrada-Roman3

  • 1Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, United States.

Annals of Hepatology
|November 22, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Implementing a new protocol for assessing cardiac risk in liver transplant candidates led to increased use of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and higher obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnoses, without impacting post-transplant cardiac complications.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Liver transplant candidate cardiac risk assessment guidelines vary.
  • Standardized pre-transplant coronary evaluation protocols are needed for consistency.
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center implemented a protocol in 2018.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of a standardized pre-transplant coronary evaluation protocol.
  • To assess changes in non-invasive versus invasive cardiac testing methods.
  • To determine the effect of the protocol on post-transplant cardiac complications.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 462 liver transplant candidates (2016-2019).
  • Categorization into three cohorts: pre-protocol, initial protocol (coronary angiography), and amended protocol (CCTA).
  • Univariate analysis using Cochran-Armitage Exact Trend Test.

Main Results:

  • Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) use increased significantly across cohorts (3% to 26.3%).
  • Obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis via CCTA rose significantly (0% to 51.4%).
  • No significant difference in post-transplant cardiac complications observed between cohorts.

Conclusions:

  • A shift towards less invasive imaging like CCTA is reasonable for at-risk liver transplant candidates.
  • The protocol facilitated a move towards non-invasive cardiac risk assessment.
  • Standardized protocols can guide appropriate pre-operative cardiac evaluation.
Abstract