Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
Task measuring implicit attractiveness as a function of skin tone and facial features: a failed replication
Elena V Stepanova1, Michael J Strube2, Kali D Mazur2
1The University of Southern Mississippi.
This study explored how facial features and skin tone influence attractiveness judgments. Initial findings suggested a link, but a larger study found no significant effect of implicit facial primes on attractiveness perception.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Perception
Background:
- Facial attractiveness perception is influenced by various factors, including features and skin tone.
- Implicit bias can affect judgments, but its role in attractiveness perception requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of implicit facial primes (Afrocentric vs. Eurocentric features, dark to light skin tone) on the perception of environmental scene attractiveness.
- To examine the relationship between implicit attractiveness judgments and explicit attractiveness ratings.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed an implicit attractiveness task, categorizing environmental scenes as attractive or unattractive after being primed with faces.
- Faces varied in Afrocentricity/Eurocentricity and skin tone (dark to light).
- Study 2 included explicit attractiveness ratings of the same faces.
Main Results:
- Study 1 suggested differential accuracy based on face type and target attractiveness at medium skin tones.
- Study 2, a more robust study, failed to replicate these findings.
- No correlation was found between explicit attractiveness ratings and implicit task accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Implicit facial primes, varying in features and skin tone, did not significantly impact the implicit perception of environmental scene attractiveness in a larger study.
- Explicit attractiveness ratings did not predict performance in the implicit task, suggesting distinct cognitive processes.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction
Implicit Personality Theories
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Relationship Formation
Facial Feedback Hypothesis

