Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Optokinetic Response As Structural and Functional Visual System Readouts in Mice and Rats
Published on: January 10, 2019
Optocollic responses in adult barn owls (Tyto furcata)
Hermann Wagner1,2, Ina Pappe3,4, Hans-Ortwin Nalbach3
1Max-Planck-Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Max-Planck-Ring 11, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. wagner@bio2.rwth-aachen.de.
Abstract:
Barn owls, like primates, have frontally oriented eyes, which allow for a large binocular overlap. While owls have similar binocular vision and visual-search strategies as primates, it is less clear whether reflexive visual behavior also resembles that of primates or is more similar to that of closer related, but lateral-eyed bird species. Test cases are visual responses driven by wide-field movement: the optokinetic, optocollic, and optomotor responses, mediated by eye, head and body movements, respectively. Adult primates have a so-called symmetric horizontal response: they show the same following behavior, if the stimulus, presented to one eye only, moves in the nasal-to-temporal direction or in the temporal-to-nasal direction. By contrast, lateral-eyed birds have an asymmetric response, responding better to temporal-to-nasal movement than to nasal-to-temporal movement. We show here that the horizontal optocollic response of adult barn owls is less asymmetric than that in the chicken for all velocities tested. Moreover, the response is symmetric for low velocities (< 20 deg/s), and similar to that of primates. The response becomes moderately asymmetric for middle-range velocities (20-40 deg/s). A definitive statement for the complex situation for higher velocities (> 40 deg/s) is not possible.
Related Concept Videos
Accessory Structures of the Eye
Anatomy of the Eyeball

