Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of prior rotator cuff repair technique and timing on clinical outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

The Influence of Os Acromiale on Patient Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same author

Inconsistencies in Terminology Used to Describe Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2026
Same author

Nanomedicines from the patient perspective - 30 years after PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society·2026
Same author

Non-Typhoidal <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Bacteremia Complicated by Native Shoulder Septic Arthritis in a Patient with Sickle Cell Disease Following Foodborne Exposure: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Infectious disease reports·2026
Same author

Decreased pain at 12 weeks post-operatively is associated with superior shoulder range of motion after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and is sustained up to two years.

JSES international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.4K

Using machine learning to predict internal rotation after anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Vikas Kumar1, Bradley S Schoch2, Christine Allen1

  • 1KenSci, Seattle, WA, USA.

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
|November 23, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning accurately predicts internal rotation (IR) after shoulder arthroplasty. This tool uses minimal preoperative data to forecast IR scores and identify patients achieving significant improvement following anatomic (aTSA) and reverse (rTSA) total shoulder arthroplasty.

Keywords:
aTSAclinical outcomesinternal rotationmachine learningprediction modelsrTSA

More Related Videos

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.5K
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

3.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.4K
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
07:45

The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report

Published on: August 4, 2022

3.5K
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

3.2K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Machine Learning in Medicine
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Predicting internal rotation (IR) improvement after shoulder arthroplasty, especially reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), remains challenging due to significant patient variability.
  • Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) generally shows more predictable IR gains compared to rTSA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively compare IR scores between aTSA and rTSA patients.
  • To develop and validate supervised machine learning models for predicting postoperative IR at multiple time points.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of clinical data from 2270 aTSA and 4198 rTSA patients using three machine learning techniques.
  • Prediction of IR scores at six postoperative intervals using full and minimal preoperative feature sets.
  • Evaluation of model accuracy using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and prediction of achieving Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) and Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) thresholds.

Main Results:

  • rTSA patients exhibited lower mean IR scores and less improvement compared to aTSA patients across all postoperative time points.
  • Machine learning models using minimal preoperative data achieved high accuracy (0.92-1.18 MAE for aTSA, 1.03-1.25 MAE for rTSA) in predicting IR scores.
  • Algorithms accurately identified patients likely to achieve MCID (90% for aTSA, 85% for rTSA) and SCB (85% for aTSA, 77% for rTSA) for IR improvement.

Conclusions:

  • Supervised machine learning accurately predicts active internal rotation after both aTSA and rTSA using a concise set of preoperative variables.
  • These predictive models can reliably identify patients who will or will not achieve clinically significant improvements in IR beyond established thresholds.