Usefulness of Multisite Ventricular Pacing in Nonresponders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Samir Saba1, Devi Nair2, Christopher R Ellis3
1Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Insights
Left ventricular (LV) multisite pacing (MSP) offers a safe and effective solution for heart failure patients who don't respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This innovative approach converts approximately 50% of non-responders, improving their outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for heart failure with impaired myocardial function and delayed ventricular activation.
- A significant portion of patients (25%-40%) do not achieve a positive response to CRT.
- Left ventricular (LV) multisite pacing (MSP) is being investigated as a method to enhance CRT response rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of utilizing the LV MSP feature in patients who are non-responders to CRT.
- To assess the clinical composite score (CCS) changes and complication rates associated with LV MSP.
Main Methods:
- The Strategic Management to Improve CRT Using Multi-Site Pacing (SMART-CRT) trial enrolled 584 CRT-defibrillator recipients.
- 102 non-responders had the LV MSP feature activated and were evaluated at 6 and 12 months using the CCS.
- Safety was assessed by the complication-free rate, and efficacy by the proportion of patients with improved CCS.
Main Results:
- The LV MSP feature demonstrated a high complication-free rate of 99.0%, exceeding the performance goal of 90%.
- Approximately 51.3% of CRT non-responders showed an improved CCS from 6 to 12 months, surpassing the 5% performance goal.
- The LV MSP feature was associated with an estimated reduction of 3.6 months in CRT-defibrillator battery longevity.
Conclusions:
- LV MSP is a safe and effective strategy for managing CRT non-responders, achieving a conversion rate of around 50%.
- This approach offers a significant improvement in clinical outcomes for a substantial number of non-responding patients.
- LV MSP should be considered as a valuable option in the treatment algorithm for patients with heart failure who do not benefit from standard CRT.
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure patients with myocardial dysfunction and delayed ventricular activation, but approximately 25% to 40% of patients do not respond to CRT. Left ventricular (LV) multisite pacing (MSP) has been proposed as a tool to improve CRT response. The goal of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of LV MSP in CRT nonresponders. Between January 2018, and September 2019, the Strategic Management to Improve CRT Using Multi-Site Pacing trial prospectively enrolled 584 CRT-defibrillator recipients for established indications at 52 sites across the United States and evaluated their response at 6 months using the clinical composite score (CCS). Of the nonresponders, 102 patients had the LV MSP feature turned on and 78 patients completed the 12-month CCS evaluation. The LV MSP feature-related complication-free rate was 99.0% with a lower 95% confidence interval limit of 94.9%, which was higher than the performance goal of 90%. The proportion of nonresponders with an improved CCS from 6 to 12 months was 51.3% with a lower 95% confidence interval limit of 41.4%, which was higher than the performance goal of 5%. The estimated mean reduction in battery longevity with the LV MSP feature was about 3.6 months (estimated battery longevity of 8.87 ± 2.08 years at 6 months and 8.07 ± 2.23 years at 12 months). In conclusion, in CRT nonresponders, the use of the LV MSP feature is safe and associated with a ∼50% conversion rate with a small projected reduction in CRT-defibrillator battery longevity. LV MSP should be considered in the management of CRT nonresponders.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management


