Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

777
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
777
Factors Affecting Illness01:18

Factors Affecting Illness

4.6K
When a person's physical, emotional, intellectual, social development or spiritual functioning is compromised, this deviation from a healthy normal state is called illness. Illness creates stress that in turn harms individuals. Irritation, anger, denial, hopelessness, and fear are behavioral and emotional changes an individual experiences in the phases of illness. A variety of factors influence a person's health and well-being.
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
4.6K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.1K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.1K
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

3.6K
At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
3.6K
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection01:26

Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection

12.8K
The hosts' susceptibility to infection depends on several factors. The integrity of the skin and mucous membranes helps protect the body against microbial attacks. When the skin is altered, the chance of infection, limb loss, and even death increases.
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
12.8K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

297
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
297

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Epidemiology of Intensive Nutritional Interventions and Restraints in Hospitalizations for Anorexia Nervosa: Annual National Trends of the United States.

The International journal of eating disorders·2026
Same author

Bioethics and the World Order: A Curious Coincidence Between Chinese and African Approaches.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same author

Bioethicists Must Push Back Against Assaults on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Bioethics Must Consider War as a Public Health Crisis: Reply to Commentaries.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Emergent personhood: reply to critics.

Journal of medical ethics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
03:53

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Published on: November 10, 2023

1.5K

Does Zero-COVID neglect health disparities?

Nancy S Jecker1,2, Derrick K S Au2

  • 1School of Medicine, Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA nsjecker@uw.edu.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|November 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This paper compares COVID-19 elimination (Zero-COVID) and mitigation strategies, examining their ethical foundations and health equity implications. It proposes a balanced long-term approach for population health.

Keywords:
COVID-19ethicspublic policy

More Related Videos

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
15:00

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Published on: February 3, 2023

2.7K
Quantification and Whole Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Air Samples
09:26

Quantification and Whole Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Air Samples

Published on: June 30, 2023

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses
03:53

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Viruses

Published on: November 10, 2023

1.5K
Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
15:00

Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies

Published on: February 3, 2023

2.7K
Quantification and Whole Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Air Samples
09:26

Quantification and Whole Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Air Samples

Published on: June 30, 2023

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Bioethics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic prompted diverse global health strategies.
  • Two prominent approaches are elimination ('Zero-COVID') and mitigation.
  • These strategies differ in their goals, methods, and ethical underpinnings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ethical basis of COVID-19 elimination and mitigation strategies.
  • To examine the societal responses to risk influencing these policies.
  • To propose a long-term strategy balancing population health and health equity.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of elimination and mitigation policies.
  • Examination of ethical arguments for and against each strategy.
  • Review of societal risk perceptions and their impact on policy.

Main Results:

  • Elimination strategies (e.g., Zero-COVID) aim for zero transmission and deaths, using strict lockdowns and testing, prevalent in Pacific Rim nations.
  • Mitigation strategies accept some disease and death, lifting restrictions upon meeting transmission targets, common in the US and Europe.
  • Ethical objections to Zero-COVID include concerns about health equity.

Conclusions:

  • Societal risk tolerance significantly shapes COVID-19 policy choices.
  • A nuanced, long-term strategy is needed to balance public health promotion with health equity.
  • Future pandemic responses must integrate ethical considerations and equitable outcomes.