Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA-seq03:21

RNA-seq

10.5K
RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases. 
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
10.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

hiPSC-derived endothelial progenitor cells seeded on aligned electrospun nanofibers promote endothelialization of biomimetic small-diameter vascular grafts in vitro.

Biomaterials advances·2026
Same author

Targeting CXCR6 suppresses granuloma formation and pulmonary fibrosis through inhibiting Th17 responses in sarcoidosis.

International immunopharmacology·2026
Same author

Quantitative label-free multiphoton imaging of collagen features predicts disease severity and progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Respiratory research·2026
Same author

Dual ROS modulation by MnO<sub>2</sub>-integrated collagen hydrogel enhances hiPSC-derived endothelial progenitor cell therapy for critical limb ischemia.

Theranostics·2026
Same author

Legumain Restrains Granuloma Formation by Inhibiting mTORC1/STAT1-Mediated M1 Macrophage Polarization in Sarcoidosis.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

High-yield trichodermin production in Trichoderma taxi via in silico-driven exporter identification and systems metabolic engineering.

Metabolic engineering·2026
Same journal

Experimental and Mechanistic Validation of PARP1pred for Identifying Potent Leads.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

DepMicroDiff: Diffusion-Based Dependency-Aware Multimodal Imputation for Microbiome Data.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

Simulating Multicolor Super-Resolution Imaging Using an RGB Camera.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

MetaphorPrompt2-A Structure and Function-Focused Approach for Extracting Causal Events from Biological Text.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

Microbiome-Metabolome Crosstalk in HPV Pathogenesis: From Ecosystem Dynamics to Translational Biomarkers.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
Same journal

Minimum-Cost Synthetic Genome Planning: An Algorithmic Framework.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells
11:26

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: May 22, 2017

14.0K

Automatic cell type identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing.

Bingbing Xie1, Qin Jiang2, Antonio Mora3

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
|November 24, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates 32 automated methods for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data analysis. These tools offer faster, more user-friendly cell-type identification compared to manual annotation.

Keywords:
Automatic identificationCell typeEager learningLazy learningMarker learningSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq)

More Related Videos

Single-cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis of Human Pancreatic Islets
11:34

Single-cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis of Human Pancreatic Islets

Published on: July 18, 2019

16.7K
Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues
10:12

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

18.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells
11:26

Single-cell RNA-Seq of Defined Subsets of Retinal Ganglion Cells

Published on: May 22, 2017

14.0K
Single-cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis of Human Pancreatic Islets
11:34

Single-cell RNA Sequencing and Analysis of Human Pancreatic Islets

Published on: July 18, 2019

16.7K
Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues
10:12

Droplet Barcoding-Based Single Cell Transcriptomics of Adult Mammalian Tissues

Published on: January 10, 2019

18.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) reveals complex cellular heterogeneity.
  • Manual cell-type annotation of scRNA-seq data is labor-intensive and requires expertise.
  • Automated methods offer potential for efficient and accurate cell-type identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review and evaluate 32 automated cell-type identification methods for scRNA-seq data.
  • To compare these methods based on prediction accuracy, F1-score, unlabeling rate, and running time.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate methods and discuss future directions.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of 32 published automated scRNA-seq analysis tools.
  • Comparative evaluation of method performance using key metrics (accuracy, F1-score, unlabeling rate, runtime).
  • Development of a free software package integrating the evaluated methods.

Main Results:

  • Performance metrics varied significantly across the 32 automated methods.
  • Specific method strengths and weaknesses were identified for different analytical scenarios.
  • Recommendations for method selection were formulated based on data characteristics and user needs.

Conclusions:

  • Automated methods significantly enhance the efficiency and accessibility of scRNA-seq data analysis.
  • Careful consideration of method-specific performance is crucial for reliable cell-type identification.
  • The developed package facilitates practical application and further research in automated scRNA-seq analysis.