Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
Published on: December 15, 2023
Supplement and Suppression: Both Boundary and Nonboundary Are Helpful for Salient Object Detection
Abstract:
Current methods aggregate multilevel features from the backbone and introduce edge information to get more refined saliency maps. However, little attention is paid to how to suppress the regions with similar saliency appearances in the background. These regions usually exist in the vicinity of salient objects and have high contrast with the background, which is easy to be misclassified as foreground. To solve this problem, we propose a gated feature interaction network (GFINet) to integrate multiple saliency features, which can utilize nonboundary features with background information to suppress pseudosalient objects and simultaneously apply boundary features to supplement edge details. Different from previous methods that only consider the complementarity between saliency and boundary, the proposed network introduces nonboundary features into the decoder to filter the pseudosalient objects. Specifically, GFINet consists of global features aggregation branch (GFAB), boundary and nonboundary features' perception branch (B&NFPB), and gated feature interaction module (GFIM). According to the global features generated by GFAB, boundary and nonboundary features produced by B&NFPB and GFIM employ a gate structure to adaptively optimize the saliency information interchange between abovementioned features and, thus, predict the final saliency maps. Besides, due to the imbalanced distribution between the boundary pixels and nonboundary ones, the binary cross-entropy (BCE) loss is difficult to predict the pixels near the boundary. Therefore, we design a border region aware (BRA) loss to further boost the quality of boundary and nonboundary, which can guide the network to focus more on the hard pixels near the boundary by assigning different weights to different positions. Compared with 12 counterparts, experimental results on five benchmark datasets show that our method has better generalization and improves the state-of-the-art approach by 4.85% averagely in terms of the regional and boundary evaluation measures. In addition, our model is more efficient with an inference speed of 50.3 FPS when processing a 320 ×320 image. Code has been made available at https://github.com/lesonly/GFINet.
Related Concept Videos
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Detection of Black Holes
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...
Local Attraction
Boundary Conditions: Lossless Lines
At the receiving end, the boundary condition states that the voltage equals the product of the receiving-end impedance and current. This relationship is expressed as a function of the incident and...
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
Design Example: Marking Boundaries of a Site Using a Compass

