Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

309
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
309
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.5K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.5K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

198
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence...
198

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental Representations of Impossible Non-Euclidean Environments.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Collaborative Navigation Improves Spatial Learning Across Symmetric and Asymmetric Locomotion in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Processing spatial cue conflict in navigation: Distance estimation.

Cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

Local spatial navigation or "steering" in patients with vestibular loss in a virtual reality environment.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2023
Same author

Statistically Optimal Cue Integration During Human Spatial Navigation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

The influence of environmental geometry and spatial symmetry on spatial updating during locomotion.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2022
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K

Bayesian decision theory and navigation.

Timothy P McNamara1, Xiaoli Chen2

  • 1Vanderbilt University, PMB 407817, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA. t.mcnamara@vanderbilt.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 25, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian decision theory explains spatial navigation by integrating multiple cues. This framework accounts for prior experiences and biases, improving our understanding of how humans navigate environments.

Keywords:
Bayesian decision theoryCue combinationCue integrationPath integrationSpatial navigation

More Related Videos

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

13.8K
Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants
06:28

A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants

Published on: August 26, 2018

6.1K
Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment
05:19

Practical Methodology of Cognitive Tasks Within a Navigational Assessment

Published on: June 1, 2015

13.8K
Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions
07:09

Integrating Visual Psychophysical Assays within a Y-Maze to Isolate the Role that Visual Features Play in Navigational Decisions

Published on: May 2, 2019

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Psychology

Background:

  • Spatial navigation relies on integrating various sensory cues, including visual and self-motion information.
  • Previous studies explored optimal cue combination but often overlooked environmental experience and complete decision models.
  • Discrepancies exist between theoretical optimal cue weights and observed empirical weights in navigation tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply Bayesian decision theory to understand spatial cue integration in navigation.
  • To explain observed discrepancies in cue weighting and heading variability using Bayesian principles.
  • To present a comprehensive decision model for spatial navigation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Bayesian decision theory and loss functions to model cue combination.
  • Analyzed existing empirical data on cue weighting and heading estimation using Bayesian frameworks.
  • Incorporated informative priors to represent navigator's prior experiences and biases.

Main Results:

  • A complete Bayesian model explained discrepancies between optimal and empirical cue weights.
  • The use of informative priors successfully explained incongruities in heading variability and direction.
  • Bayesian priors accounted for biases in linear displacement estimates during visual path integration.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian decision theory provides a robust framework for studying human spatial navigation.
  • This approach offers a deeper understanding of how prior experiences and biases influence navigational behavior.
  • The model successfully reconciles empirical findings with theoretical predictions in spatial cue integration.