Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Acetabular and Femoral Component Positioning Using Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach in Total Hip
Tarun Goyal1, Arghya Kundu Choudhury2, Souvik Paul2
1Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, 151001 Punjab India.
Purpose:
Direct anterior approach (DAA) has recently become popular in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, irrespective of the surgical approach used, component malposition is an important factor affecting function and complications after THA. This study aims to compare component positioning on the femoral and acetabular side between DAA and posterior approach (PA) to the hip joint. We hypothesized that the two approaches are similar in terms of component positioning.
Methods:
We prospectively studied 50 patients, matched according to age, sex, and body mass index, undergoing THA, divided non-randomly into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 25 patients (35 hips) undergoing THA using DAA and group 2 comprised 25 patients (25 hips) undergoing THA using PA. Ten patients from group 1 had simultaneous bilateral THA. Radiological parameters studied were acetabular inclination (AI), coronal femoral stem alignment (CFA), leg length difference (LLD), acetabular cup version (AV), and femoral stem version (FV).
Results:
There was no significant difference in AI, CFA, LLD, AV, and FV between the two groups. Excellent to good inter and intra-observer reliability expressed in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was noted for all the radiographic measurements.
Conclusion:
Both DAA and PA for THA achieve comparable radiological component positioning. DAA may not provide any advantage over PA in terms of positioning of the prosthesis.
Level Of Evidence:
Level II, non-randomized comparative study.
