Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

243

Reporting Modifications in Surgical Innovation: A Systematic Scoping Review Protocol.

Christin Hoffmann1, Sina Hossaini1, Sian Cousins1

  • 1National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (Surgical Innovation Theme), Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

International Journal of Surgery Protocols
|November 26, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision-making: a comprehensive systematic review and COSMIN quality appraisal.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Reporting of Cohort and Routinely Collected Data in Randomised Controlled Trial Protocols (SPIRIT-ROUTINE): extension checklist with explanation and elaboration.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy versus usual care for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention: the SWHSI 2 pragmatic RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026
Same author

De-implementation of healthcare interventions post-COVID-19: evidence from the Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme in England.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Staff training to improve participant recruitment into surgical randomised controlled trials: A feasibility study within a trial (SWAT) across four host trials simultaneously.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Meta-core outcome set for randomized trials and clinical practice for curative surgical oncology: patient and healthcare consensus statement.

BJS open·2026

This review synthesizes literature on modifications to surgical procedures and devices, aiming to standardize their reporting for safer innovation. It identifies gaps in defining, classifying, and reporting these changes to improve transparency.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Medical Device Development
  • Procedure Modification

Background:

  • Surgical innovation improves patient care through new procedures and devices.
  • Modifications are integral to refining surgical techniques and devices during clinical introduction.
  • Current lack of standardized reporting for modifications hinders efficient and transparent innovation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and summarize existing literature on the definition, perception, and classification of modifications in surgical innovation.
  • To explore current views on measuring and reporting these modifications.
  • To inform the development of a framework for standardized reporting and sharing of modifications.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
Keywords:
InnovationModificationsOperativeProceduresReviewSurgery

More Related Videos

Robot-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Congenital Cholesteatoma
02:37

Robot-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Congenital Cholesteatoma

Published on: December 15, 2023

905
Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
08:06

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

448

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

243
Robot-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Congenital Cholesteatoma
02:37

Robot-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Congenital Cholesteatoma

Published on: December 15, 2023

905
Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy
08:06

Mixed Reality Assisted Radical Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Published on: January 31, 2025

448
  • Literature searches included MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and snowball searches.
  • Data extraction focused on definitions, perceptions, classifications, and reporting of modifications, analyzed thematically.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified current approaches to defining, perceiving, and classifying modifications in surgical innovation.
    • Synthesized existing views on the measurement and reporting of procedural and device modifications.
    • Findings will contribute to a preliminary conceptual framework for modification reporting.

    Conclusions:

    • An in-depth understanding of current practices regarding surgical modification reporting is generated.
    • This review is a crucial step towards developing a framework for transparent, real-time reporting of modifications.
    • Standardized reporting will enhance the safety and efficiency of surgical innovation.