Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse POP Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Caesarean delivery and pubertal timing in boys and girls: A Danish population-based cohort study
Kun Huang1,2, Anne Gaml-Sørensen2, Lea Lykke Harrits Lunddorf2
1Department of Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health, Scientific Research Center in Preventive Medicine, MOE Key Laboratory of Population Health Across Life Cycle, NHC Key Laboratory of Study on Abnormal Gametes and Reproductive Tract, Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Population Health and Aristogenics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Insights
Caesarean delivery does not appear to affect the timing of puberty in children. This large study found no significant differences in pubertal development for those born via caesarean birth compared to vaginal birth.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric endocrinology
- Reproductive health
- Child development
Background:
- Growing public and scientific interest surrounds the decreasing age of pubertal onset.
- While prenatal and postnatal stress are linked to earlier puberty, the impact of intrapartum stress remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the potential influence of caesarean delivery on the timing of puberty in both boys and girls.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) from 2000-2003, including 15,731 mother-child pairs.
- Categorized delivery modes: non-instrumental vaginal, instrumental vaginal, elective caesarean, emergency caesarean, and unspecified caesarean.
- Assessed pubertal development via self-reported questionnaires from age 11, analyzing milestones like Tanner stages, menarche, and voice break using regression models.
Main Results:
- 17.9% of participants (2810) were born via caesarean delivery.
- Neither elective nor emergency caesarean delivery was associated with earlier pubertal milestones in boys or girls.
- Combined indicator analysis showed minimal mean age differences for caesarean deliveries, with confidence intervals overlapping zero.
Conclusions:
- Caesarean delivery does not demonstrate a clinically significant impact on the timing of pubertal development in children.
- Findings suggest that mode of delivery is unlikely to be a major factor in altered pubertal timing.
Background:
There is considerable public and scientific interest in the declining age of pubertal timing. Prenatal and postnatal stress has been proposed to relate with earlier pubertal timing, but it remains unknown whether intrapartum stress may affect pubertal timing as well.
Objective:
This study aims to examine the potential effect of caesarean delivery on pubertal timing in boys and girls.
Methods:
This study was based upon the nationwide Puberty Cohort nested within the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC) from 2000 to 2003. A total of 15,731 mother-child pairs with complete information on delivery mode and puberty were included in the main analysis. The delivery mode was categorised into non-instrumental vaginal delivery (reference), instrumental vaginal delivery, elective caesarean delivery before labour, emergency caesarean delivery during labour and un-specified caesarean delivery. Children's pubertal development were self-reported in web-based questionnaires from 11 years of age and every 6 months throughout puberty (2012-2019), including Tanner stages 2-5, menarche, voice break, first ejaculation, axillary hair growth and the onset of acne. Regression models for censored, normally distributed time-to-event data were used to estimate mean monthly differences in age at attaining the different pubertal milestones and the average of all these estimates for each sex (a combined indicator of pubertal timing).
Results:
A total of 2810 participants were born by caesarean delivery (17.9%). Neither elective nor emergency caesarean delivery was associated with earlier age at achieving the pubertal milestones in boys or in girls. For the combined indicator, the mean age differences for elective caesarean delivery and emergency caesarean delivery were 0.1 (95% CI -1.1, 1.4) months and -0.7 (95% CI -2.0, 0.5) months in boys and 0.7 (95% CI -0.7, 2.0) and 0.2 (95% CI -1.3, 1.7) in girls.
Conclusions:
This study does not suggest a clinically important effect of caesarean delivery on children's pubertal timing.
Related Concept Videos
Signs of Puberty
Conduct Disorder
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Nature and Nurture
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Regression Toward the Mean

