Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

11:11
Efficient SARS-CoV-2 Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase PCR Saliva Diagnostic Strategy utilizing Open-Source Pipetting Robots
Published on: February 11, 2022
4.7K
SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR Test Detection Rates Are Associated with Patient Age, Sex, and Time since Diagnosis
Matan Levine-Tiefenbrun1, Idan Yelin1, Hedva Uriel2
1Biology Faculty, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics : JMD
|November 26, 2021
Summary
The quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 shows an 83.1% detection rate within 14 days post-diagnosis. Detection accuracy decreases over time and is lower for women and younger patients due to reduced viral loads.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Epidemiology
- Diagnostic testing
Background:
- Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is crucial for detecting SARS-CoV-2.
- Understanding RT-qPCR test reliability across patient demographics and disease stages is vital for public health strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the detection rate of RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2.
- To assess the influence of patient demographics, disease progression, and viral RNA load on RT-qPCR test accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 843,917 RT-qPCR test results from 521,696 patients diagnosed with COVID-19.
- Definition of a "positive period" to estimate detection rates.
- Regression analyses to identify associations between detection rates and time post-diagnosis, demographics, and viral RNA copy number (cycle threshold values).
Main Results:
- The overall RT-qPCR detection rate within 14 days of diagnosis was 83.1%, peaking at 89.3% between days 0-5.
- Detection rates were significantly associated with patient age and sex.
- The Allplex 2019-nCoV RT-qPCR kit's detection rate correlated with viral RNA copy number (P < 10^-9).
Conclusions:
- RT-qPCR test reliability diminishes in later stages of infection.
- Women and younger patients exhibit lower detection rates, linked to typically lower viral loads.
- These findings impact the interpretation of RT-qPCR results for epidemiological surveillance and patient management.

