Verification of a Stiffness-Variable Control System with Feed-Forward Predictive Earthquake Energy Analysis
Tzu-Kang Lin1, Tappiti Chandrasekhara1, Zheng-Jia Liu1
1Department of Civil Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 27, 2021
Summary
A new Feed-Forward Predictive Earthquake Energy Analysis (FPEEA) algorithm effectively reduces seismic responses for both near-fault and far-field earthquakes. This advanced system offers superior control over structural displacement and acceleration, enhancing seismic safety.
Area of Science:
- Structural Engineering
- Seismic Mitigation
- Control Systems
Background:
- Semi-active isolation systems with controllable stiffness are crucial for seismic mitigation.
- Existing systems are more effective for far-field than near-fault earthquakes.
- A comprehensive system is needed for both near-fault and far-field seismic events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a new algorithm, Feed-Forward Predictive Earthquake Energy Analysis (FPEEA), for seismic response reduction.
- To identify ground motion characteristics and optimize energy balance for reduced seismic impact.
- To develop a system offering comparable seismic response reduction for diverse earthquake types.
Main Methods:
- Developed the Feed-Forward Predictive Earthquake Energy Analysis (FPEEA) algorithm.
- Considered seismic velocity spectrum energy distribution and optimized kinetic/potential energy balance.
- Utilized a two-degree-of-freedom structure for numerical simulations and shaking table tests.
Main Results:
- FPEEA significantly suppressed isolation layer displacement, outperforming other control methods.
- FPEEA demonstrated superior control over superstructure acceleration.
- Shaking table tests confirmed the algorithm's satisfactory performance in reducing both displacement and acceleration.
Conclusions:
- The proposed FPEEA algorithm shows significant potential for practical application in seismic mitigation.
- FPEEA provides robust performance against both near-fault and far-field earthquake excitations.
- The algorithm enhances structural safety by effectively reducing seismic responses.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback control systems
478
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
478
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
597
The dynamic modulus of elasticity assesses how a concrete structure deforms under impact or dynamic loads. It is typically higher than the static modulus of elasticity, measured under slow, steady loading conditions.
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by...
597
Control Systems
1.5K
Control systems are everywhere in contemporary society, influencing diverse applications from aerospace to automated manufacturing. These systems can be found naturally within biological processes, such as blood sugar regulation and heart rate adjustment in response to stress, as well as in man-made systems like elevators and automated vehicles. A control system is essentially a network of subsystems and processes that collaboratively convert specific inputs into desired outputs.
At the heart...
At the heart...
1.5K
PD Controller: Design
384
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
384
Open and closed-loop control systems
1.1K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.1K
Time-Domain Interpretation of PD Control
198
Proportional-Derivative (PD) control is a widely used control method in various engineering systems to enhance stability and performance. In a system with only proportional control, common issues include high maximum overshoot and oscillation, observed in both the error signal and its rate of change. This behavior can be divided into three distinct phases: initial overshoot, subsequent undershoot, and gradual stabilization.
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
Consider the example of control of motor torque. Initially, a positive...
198


