Inter- and Intraobserver Repeatability of Myocardial Flow Reserve Values Determined with SPECT Study Using a
Paweł Cichocki1, Michał Błaszczyk2, Kamila Cygulska3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 92-216 Lodz, Poland.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
|November 27, 2021
Summary
This study assessed the repeatability of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) using CZT SPECT. Repeatability was good overall but poor in the RCA territory, suggesting limitations for this specific application.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) are crucial for diagnosing multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) SPECT offers an alternative to Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for MBF/MFR assessment.
- Current processing methods for CZT SPECT studies involve subjective factors impacting accuracy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the intra- and interobserver repeatability of MBF and MFR values derived from CZT SPECT imaging.
- To identify potential sources of variability in MBF and MFR measurements.
- To compare the diagnostic utility of CZT SPECT with PET for specific coronary territories.
Main Methods:
- Fifty-seven adult patients underwent MBF and MFR assessment using a CZT SPECT gamma camera (Discovery NM530c) with 99mTc-MIBI.
- A two-day rest/dipyridamole protocol was employed.
- Data were processed using Corridor4DM software, with assessments performed twice by one operator and once by a second independent operator.
Main Results:
- Repeatability of MBF and MFR values was found to be good across the whole myocardium, as well as in the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) vascular territories.
- A poor degree of repeatability was observed specifically within the right coronary artery (RCA) vascular territory.
- The findings suggest variability in measurement consistency depending on the coronary artery assessed.
Conclusions:
- Poor repeatability in the RCA territory may stem from issues with automatic heart axis orientation and cardiac creep during post-processing.
- Improvements in automatic heart orientation and motion correction algorithms are anticipated to enhance measurement repeatability.
- For MFR assessment in the RCA territory, PET imaging may currently be a more reliable option than CZT SPECT, given software limitations.


