Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Evaluation of Patients' Posture and Gait Profile After Lumbar Fusion Surgery by Video Rasterstereography and Treadmill Gait Analysis
Published on: March 23, 2019
Translation of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) for use in inpatient cancer rehabilitation
Keara M McNair1, Dana Zeitlin2, Anna Marie Slivka3
1Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, New Jersey, USA.
Background:
Better tools are needed to predict functional decline and oncologic prognosis in inpatient cancer rehabilitation. The Karnofky Performance Status (KPS) is a widely used scale of functional performance in oncology, although the scale differs from current rehabilitation terminology. Use of the KPS in inpatient rehabilitation may support a shared method of communication between cancer rehabilitation providers and the primary oncology teams.
Objective:
To establish interrater reliability for translation of the KPS for use in inpatient cancer rehabilitation.
Design:
Retrospective interrater reliability review.
Setting:
A large inpatient rehabilitation hospital system.
Participants:
Fifty randomized charts were chosen for review from a larger database of all patients admitted to an inpatient cancer rehabilitation program in 2020.
Intervention:
Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures:
The KPS scale was translated into common inpatient rehabilitation grading consistent with the Continuity and Assessment Record and Evaluation (CARE) Item Set to support its use in this specialty area. Additionally, a list of best practice guidelines and scoring instructions were created to assist raters in determining appropriate levels within the scale. Members of the inpatient cancer rehabilitation team scored all patients within the larger database (n = 424) throughout 2020. A blinded rater completed retrospective chart reviews to score the 50-chart sample. A two-way random effects model was used to calculate an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the KPS scores at each of three time points (premorbid, admission, and discharge).
Results:
The KPS interpretation for rehabilitation proved to be statistically reliable for the 50-chart sample. The premorbid KPS interrater reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-0.82), admission KPS reliability was good (ICC = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.93), and discharge reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.91-0.98).
Conclusion:
The KPS translation at three time points (premorbid, admission, and discharge) during the inpatient rehabilitation continuum has acceptable interrater reliability.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Restorative Care
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...

