Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
The relationship between feedback and evaluative judgement in undergraduate nursing and midwifery education: An
Chanika Ilangakoon1, Rola Ajjawi2, Ruth Endacott3
1Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia; Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Aim:
This integrative review aims to explore the relationship between feedback and evaluative judgement in undergraduate nursing and midwifery education.
Background:
Research in higher education has shown that feedback practices can lead to students' developing evaluative judgement; thought critical for performance improvement and life-long learning. While literature in nursing and midwifery education has not yet employed the term 'evaluative judgement' explicitly, there might be similar concepts and practices that seek to develop students' judgement of performance that sustain learning beyond the immediate task.
Design:
An integrative review of the nursing and midwifery feedback literature.
Methods:
In February 2020, six online databases (CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, ERIC, PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE) were systematically searched for literature published between January 1989-February 2020. Synonyms for feedback and evaluative judgement were used to inform our search. This review included a rigorous team-based, five-stage approach: (1) identifying the problem; (2) conducting the search; (3) evaluating the data; (4) analysing the data; and (5) presenting the integrative review.
Results:
A total of 1408 studies were initially retrieved with 543 duplicates. 865 abstracts were screened using eligibility criteria, resulting in the exclusion of 835 studies. Thirty full-text studies were appraised for quality. Eighteen studies with diverse methodologies achieved a medium-high quality score for inclusion in data analysis. Conceptions of feedback and evaluative judgement were identified in all studies; despite none using the term 'evaluative judgement' explicitly. Thematic analysis of the studies resulted in seven themes: conceptions of feedback, purposes of feedback, sources of feedback, modes of feedback, conceptions of evaluative judgement, purposes of evaluative judgement and relationships between feedback and evaluative judgement.
Conclusions:
While our findings supported contemporary higher education research, the feedback-evaluative judgement relationship is novel in nursing education. We encourage educators to design feedback activities privileging students' active engagement through dialogic feedback, reflection and self-assessment, to develop their evaluative judgement of practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Evaluation
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Critical Thinking I
Current Trends in Nursing II
Patient-centered Care

