Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

1.2K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
1.2K
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development01:19

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

243
Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal...
243
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.7K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.7K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.3K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.3K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.8K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.8K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

29.3K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
29.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effects of Handedness Consistency on the Identification of Own- and Cross-Race Faces.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

Increased levels of autistic traits are associated with atypical moral judgments.

Acta psychologica·2023
Same author

Differences in moral judgment predict behavior in a Covid triage game scenario.

Personality and individual differences·2022
Same author

Predicting interactions in handedness research: The role of integrated versus independent dual-processes.

Laterality·2021
Same author

Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training.

Psychological research·2018
Same author

Influencing health decision-making: A study of colour and message framing.

Psychology & health·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K

Individual differences in moral judgment predict attitudes towards mandatory vaccinations.

Evan Clarkson1, John D Jasper1

  • 1University of Toledo, 2801 W Bancroft Street, Toledo, OH 43606, United States of America.

Personality and Individual Differences
|November 29, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Political conservatism and deontological moral judgments correlate with lower acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Conversely, utilitarian moral reasoning is linked to greater agreement with mandates, highlighting moral psychology

Keywords:
Covid-19Individual differencesMoral judgmentPoliticsVaccination

More Related Videos

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.8K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.8K
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

2.8K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Political Science
  • Public Health

Background:

  • COVID-19 vaccine skepticism is a politicized issue.
  • Policies like vaccine passports aim to increase vaccination rates.
  • Public response to such policies is varied.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of conservatism and moral judgments on public agreement with COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
  • To understand individual differences driving varied responses to vaccine policies.

Main Methods:

  • Survey data collected from 266 participants between January and March 2021.
  • Assessed levels of political conservatism.
  • Examined moral judgments using traditional deontological (D-process) and utilitarian frameworks via switch and footbridge dilemmas.

Main Results:

  • Higher conservatism and stronger deontological moral processing were associated with decreased agreement to a government-imposed vaccine mandate.
  • Participants employing utilitarian moral judgments showed greater agreement with the vaccine mandate.
  • Findings align with existing research on political polarization regarding COVID-19.

Conclusions:

  • Individual differences in moral judgment significantly predict opinions on COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
  • Moral psychology offers insights into public health policy acceptance.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for addressing vaccine hesitancy and policy debates.