Effect of Intravenous or Intraosseous Calcium vs Saline on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Adults With

Mikael Fink Vallentin1, Asger Granfeldt2, Carsten Meilandt1

  • 1Prehospital Emergency Medical Services, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus.

JAMA
|November 30, 2021
PubMed

Insights

Administration of calcium during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve return of spontaneous circulation in adults. The trial was stopped early due to concerns about harm, with no significant benefits observed for survival or neurological outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Cardiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • The efficacy of calcium administration in cardiac arrest patients remains uncertain.
  • Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presents a critical medical emergency with significant mortality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if calcium administration improves return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in adults experiencing OHCA.

Main Methods:

  • A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial involving 397 adult OHCA patients.
  • Intervention: intravenous or intraosseous calcium chloride versus saline, administered with epinephrine.
  • Primary outcome: sustained ROSC; secondary outcomes: survival and neurological function at 30 and 90 days.

Main Results:

  • The trial was halted early due to safety concerns in the calcium group.
  • No significant difference in sustained ROSC between calcium (19%) and saline (27%) groups (RR, 0.72; P=.09).
  • No significant improvements in survival or favorable neurological outcomes were observed in the calcium group. Hypercalcemia was noted in 74% of patients with ROSC in the calcium group.

Conclusions:

  • Calcium administration did not enhance sustained ROSC in adult OHCA patients.
  • The findings do not support the use of calcium during OHCA in adults.
  • Concerns regarding potential harm warrant caution in calcium use during cardiac arrest.
Abstract