Temporal proteomics reveal specific cell cycle oncoprotein downregulation by p97/VCP inhibition
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Studying Cell Cycle-regulated Gene Expression by Two Complementary Cell Synchronization Protocols
Published on: June 6, 2017
Feng Wang1, Shan Li1, Nadia Houerbi1
1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Abstract:
Targeting protein quality control (PQC) pathways using proteasome or p97/VCP inhibition can effectively treat blood tumors. However, in solid tumors, only p97/VCP inhibitors are effective. To probe this difference in efficacy, we tracked HCT116 colon cancer cells using temporal proteomics to define the cellular and molecular responses to proteasome and p97 inhibition. Proteins involved in general PQC pathways were similarly upregulated by both treatments, suggesting that the proteotoxic stress caused by inhibitors does not explain the differential therapeutic effectiveness. Unexpectedly, proteins specifically dysregulated by two p97 inhibitors are involved in cell cycle control. Indeed, eleven cell cycle proteins were downregulated by p97 inhibition but not by proteasome inhibition. Western blot analysis validated the degradation of cyclin D1 and Securin, which depends on proteasome but not on p97. Differing regulation of cell cycle proteins by p97 and the proteasome may, therefore, explain the therapeutic efficacy of p97 inhibitors in colon cancer.
Insights
p97/VCP inhibitors, unlike proteasome inhibitors, show efficacy in solid tumors by downregulating cell cycle proteins. This targeted cell cycle disruption explains the differential therapeutic effectiveness of p97/VCP inhibitors in colon cancer.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Protein quality control (PQC) pathways are crucial therapeutic targets in cancer.
- Proteasome or p97/VCP inhibition effectively treats blood tumors, but only p97/VCP inhibitors show efficacy in solid tumors.
- The molecular basis for this differential efficacy remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cellular and molecular responses to proteasome and p97/VCP inhibition in HCT116 colon cancer cells.
- To identify the mechanisms underlying the differential therapeutic effectiveness of these inhibitors in solid tumors.
Main Methods:
- Temporal proteomics was employed to track cellular responses.
- Western blot analysis was used to validate protein degradation.
Main Results:
- Both proteasome and p97/VCP inhibition upregulated general PQC proteins similarly.
- p97/VCP inhibition, but not proteasome inhibition, led to the downregulation of eleven cell cycle proteins.
- Cyclin D1 and Securin degradation were validated as proteasome-dependent, not p97/VCP-dependent.
Conclusions:
- Differential regulation of cell cycle proteins by p97/VCP and proteasome pathways explains the therapeutic efficacy of p97/VCP inhibitors in colon cancer.
- Targeting cell cycle control via p97/VCP inhibition offers a promising therapeutic strategy for solid tumors.
Related Concept Videos
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Negative Regulator Molecules
Anaphase Promoting Complex
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Positive Regulator Molecules
The Cell Cycle Control System
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are the primary cell cycle regulators and...

