Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
507
Comparison of Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Processors
Maria Madalena Canina Pinheiro1, Patricia Cotta Mancini2, Alexandra Dezani Soares3
1Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
|November 30, 2021
Summary
Cochlear implant (CI) users experienced better speech recognition with off-the-ear (OTE) processors compared to behind-the-ear (BTE) processors in noisy environments. This finding suggests OTE devices may offer improved hearing performance for CI recipients in challenging listening situations.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Speech and Hearing Sciences
Background:
- Speech recognition in noisy environments presents a significant challenge for cochlear implant (CI) users and manufacturers.
- CI manufacturers are actively developing innovative processors and signal processing strategies to enhance user experience and device efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the speech recognition capabilities of CI users employing off-the-ear (OTE) and behind-the-ear (BTE) sound processors.
- To evaluate the performance differences between OTE and BTE processors in various auditory conditions.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 51 CI recipients using the Nucleus 5 (N5) BTE processor.
- Speech perception was assessed using the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) in quiet and noisy conditions with both the N5 BTE and Kanso OTE processors.
- Paired comparison analyses were conducted across three conditions: quiet, fixed speech and noise levels, and adaptive speech levels with fixed noise.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in speech recognition was observed between the N5 and Kanso processors in quiet conditions.
- The OTE (Kanso) processor demonstrated superior performance compared to the BTE (N5) processor in all tested noisy conditions.
- A statistically significant mean difference of 8.1 percentage points favored the Kanso OTE processor in sentence recognition scores under fixed speech and noise levels.
Conclusions:
- Cochlear implant users achieved a better signal-to-noise ratio with the OTE processor.
- The OTE processor resulted in a higher percentage of sentence recognition compared to the BTE processor.
- These findings indicate that OTE processors may offer an advantage for CI users in challenging listening environments.

