Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regulation of Expression at Multiple Steps01:23

Regulation of Expression at Multiple Steps

1.1K
The gene expression in cells is regulated at different stages: (i) transcription, (ii) RNA processing, (iii) RNA localization, and (iv) translation. Transcriptional regulation is mediated by regulatory proteins such as transcription factors, activators, or repressors—these control gene expression by initiating or inhibiting the transcription of genes. Once a precursor or pre-mRNA is produced, it undergoes post-transcriptional modification, including 5' capping, splicing, and the...
1.1K
Combinatorial Gene Control02:33

Combinatorial Gene Control

8.6K
Combinatorial gene control is the synergistic action of several transcriptional factors to regulate the expression of a single gene. The absence of one or more of these factors may lead to a significant difference in the level of gene expression or repression.
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
8.6K
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps02:24

Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps

23.8K
Gene expression can be regulated at almost every step from gene to protein. Transcription is the step that is most commonly regulated. This involves the binding of proteins to short regulatory sequences on the DNA. This association can either promote or inhibit the transcription of a gene associated with the respective sequence.
Transcription results in the generation of precursor (pre-mRNA) that consists of both exons and introns, which needs further processing before being translated to a...
23.8K
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

2.4K
2.4K
Coordination of Gene Expression Processes in Bacteria01:29

Coordination of Gene Expression Processes in Bacteria

220
The DNA replication, transcription, and translation processes are intricately coupled in bacteria, allowing efficient gene expression and rapid protein synthesis. While this physical and functional coordination is advantageous, it introduces challenges that bacteria overcome through specific regulatory mechanisms.Coupling of Replication, Transcription, and TranslationThe coupling of replication, transcription, and translation is a hallmark of bacterial gene expression. As the replisome unwinds...
220
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

12.0K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Near chromosome-level genome assembly of Neomusotima conspurcatalis gives insights into the evolution of moth genome architecture and fern-insect interactions.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Landscape Genomics and Evolutionary History of <i>Megamelus scutellaris</i>, a Biocontrol Agent of the Invasive Water Hyacinth (<i>Pontederia crassipes</i>).

Evolutionary applications·2026
Same author

A haplotype-resolved, chromosome-scale genome assembly for the southern live oak, Quercus virginiana.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Genome-wide evolutionary characterization and expression analysis of the AT-HOOK MOTIF CONTAINING NUCLEAR LOCALIZED gene family in Brachypodium distachyon.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2025
Same author

GEMDiff: a diffusion workflow bridges between normal and tumor gene expression states: a breast cancer case study.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Improving Mass-Rearing Techniques for Releases of <i>Floracarus perrepae</i>, a Biological Control Agent for Old World Climbing Fern (<i>Lygodium microphyllum</i>).

Insects·2025
Same journal

STED: flexible cross-modal topic modeling infers cell-type-specific regulatory landscapes from bulk epigenomics.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A knowledge-guided deep learning framework for quantitative nucleic acid testing.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Optimal transport for label transfer in single-cell multi-omics integration.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating completeness, coherence, and consistency of genome-scale function annotations.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Transformers for single-cell RNA sequencing: a survey.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 11, 2025

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics
07:28

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics

Published on: October 19, 2021

3.3K

Addressing noise in co-expression network construction.

Joshua J R Burns1, Benjamin T Shealy2, Mitchell S Greer3

  • 1Department of Horticulture, 149 Johnson Hall. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|December 1, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Large datasets challenge gene co-expression network (GCN) construction, leading to misleading edges. The Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit offers a dynamic approach for accurate, context-specific GCNs (csGCNs).

Keywords:
co-expressiongene expressionmultidimensionalnetworksnoise

More Related Videos

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.7K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2025

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics
07:28

JUMPn: A Streamlined Application for Protein Co-Expression Clustering and Network Analysis in Proteomics

Published on: October 19, 2021

3.3K
Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

3.7K
Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
09:49

Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • Gene co-expression networks (GCNs) are valuable for hypothesis generation and biomarker discovery in molecular research.
  • Transcriptome data from large, multivariable studies are increasingly used for GCN construction.
  • Standard GCN methods struggle with large datasets, leading to inaccurate or missed network connections.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the challenges of constructing GCNs from large, multivariable transcriptome datasets.
  • To introduce a dynamic approach for building statistically sound and context-specific GCNs (csGCNs).
  • To guide researchers in recognizing and overcoming limitations in GCN construction.

Main Methods:

  • Demonstration of misleading GCN edges using a 475-sample dataset, showing up to 97% inaccuracy.
  • Explanation of how unmet statistical assumptions and confounding variables lead to false correlations.
  • Application of the Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit for dynamic GCN analysis.

Main Results:

  • A significant proportion of GCN edges derived from large datasets can be misleading due to statistical issues.
  • The Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit addresses confounding variables and ensures statistical test assumptions.
  • This toolkit facilitates the creation of context-specific GCNs (csGCNs) by associating experimental context with network edges.

Conclusions:

  • The 'one-size-fits-all' approach to GCN construction is inadequate for large, complex biological datasets.
  • Dynamic network construction methods, like those using the Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit, are essential for accuracy.
  • Context-specific GCNs (csGCNs) improve the reliability of network inference and biological interpretation.