Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025
06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.5K
The patient engagement evaluation tool was valid for clinical practice guideline development
Ainsley Moore1, Yin Wu2, Linda Kwakkenbos3
1Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, McMaster, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|December 1, 2021
Summary
The Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PEET) in its 6-item version (PEET-6) and 12-item version (PEET-12) reliably measures patient and public involvement in guideline development. These tools inform guideline developers about the quality of patient engagement activities.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Patient and Public Involvement
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
Background:
- Effective patient and public involvement is crucial for high-quality clinical practice guidelines.
- Existing tools may not adequately capture the nuances of patient engagement in guideline development.
- Standardized evaluation methods are needed to assess the quality of involvement activities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability and validity of the 6-item (PEET-6) and 12-item (PEET-12) Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool.
- To provide guideline developers with a robust instrument to assess patient and public involvement quality.
- To refine the PEET tool for improved efficiency and applicability.
Main Methods:
- The PEET-12 and validation questions were administered to 290 participants involved in 10 guideline development projects (2018-2020).
- Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) assessed the single-factor structure validity.
- Cronbach's alpha and Pearson correlations evaluated internal consistency and construct validity, respectively.
Main Results:
- Item analysis and expert review led to the development of the more efficient PEET-6.
- CFA supported a single-factor structure for PEET-6 (χ²(15)=5173.4, P<0.001, TLI=1.00, CFI=0.99, RMSEA=0.08).
- A strong correlation (0.71, 95% CI [0.65, 0.77]) between PEET-6 and validation questions supported construct validity.
Conclusions:
- The PEET-6 and PEET-12 are validated and reliable instruments.
- These tools effectively measure patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline development.
- The findings support the use of PEET tools to enhance guideline development processes.
Related Concept Videos
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
3.3K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.3K
01:15Nursing Evaluation
3.8K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.8K
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
2.0K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.0K
01:03Data Validation
5.8K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.8K
01:13Patient-centered Care
2.5K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.5K
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
1.6K
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
1.6K