Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Codesigning person-centred quality indicators with diverse communities: A qualitative patient engagement study
Kimberly Manalili1, Fartoon M Siad1, Marichu Antonio2
1Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Introduction:
Effective engagement of underrepresented communities in health research and policy remains a challenge due to barriers that hinder participation. Our study had two objectives: (1) identify themes of person-centred care (PCC) from perspectives of diverse patients/caregivers that would inform the development of person-centred quality indicators (PC-QIs) for evaluating the quality of PCC and initiatives to improve PCC and (2) explore innovative participatory approaches to engage ethnocultural communities in qualitative research.
Methods:
Drawing on participatory action research methods, we partnered with a community-based organization to train six 'Community Brokers' from the Chinese, Filipino, South Asian, Latino-Hispanic, East African and Syrian communities, who were engaged throughout the study. We also partnered with the provincial health organization to engage their Patient and Family Advisory, who represented further aspects of diversity. We conducted focus group discussions with patients/caregivers to obtain their perspectives on their values, preferences and needs regarding PCC. We identified themes through our study and engaged provincial stakeholders to prioritize these themes for informing the development of PC-QIs and codesign initiatives for improving PCC.
Results:
Eight focus groups were conducted with 66 diverse participants. Ethnocultural communities highlighted themes related to access and cost of care, language barriers and culture, while the Patient and Family Advisory emphasized patient and caregiver engagement. Together with provincial stakeholders, initiatives were identified to improve PCC, such as codesigning innovative models of training and evaluation of healthcare providers.
Conclusion:
Incorporating patient and community voices requires addressing issues related to equity and understanding barriers to effective and meaningful engagement.
Patient Or Public Contribution:
Patient and public engagement was central to our research study. This included partnership with a community-based organization, with a broad network of ethnocultural communities, as well as the provincial health service delivery organization, who both facilitated the ongoing engagement of diverse patients/caregiver communities throughout our study including designing the study, recruiting participants, collecting and organizing data, interpreting findings and mobilizing knowledge. Drawing from participatory action research methods, patients and the public were involved in the codesign of the PC-QIs and initiatives to improve PCC in the province based on the findings from our study.
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...

