Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing Synthetic Microbial Communities for Generating Second-Generation Biofertilizers
Published on: May 24, 2024
Response-Belonging, Interdisciplinarity, and Fragmentation: On the Conditions for a Bioethical Discourse Community
1Alfred Deakin Institute, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia. christopher.mayes@deakin.edu.au.
Abstract:
I have been invited to reflect on "Discourse communities and the discourses of experience" a paper co-authored by Little, Jordens, and Sayers and discuss how their analysis of discourse communities has influenced the development of bioethics and consider its influence now and potential effects in the future. Their paper examines the way different discourse communities are shaped by different experiences and desires. The shared language and experiences can provide a sense of belonging and familiarity. These can be positive aspects of a discourse community, but there are also risks restricting the voices and experiences that can be heard and recognized. In this essay I hope to weave together three threads: an analysis of Little, Jordens, and Sayer's research on discourse communities; the narrative interview I conducted with Little about his own experiences in establishing a bioethics centre; and my own experience of the bioethical discourse community established by Little.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics and Bioethics
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Ethical Dilemmas I
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Self Within Cultural Contexts

