Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Murine Oropharyngeal Aspiration Model of Ventilator-associated and Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
Published on: June 28, 2018
Mouse pneumonia model by Acinetobacter baumannii multidrug resistant strains: Comparison between intranasal
Gabriella Bergamini1, Maria Elisa Perico2, Stefano Di Palma3
1Translational Microbiology, Antibacterial Discovery, Aptuit (Verona) S.r.l., an Evotec Company DD&D Research Centre, Verona, Italy.
Abstract:
Infectious pneumonia induced by multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii strains is among the most common and deadly forms of healthcare acquired infections. Over the years, different strategies have been put in place to increase host susceptibility to MDR A. baumannii, since only a self-limiting pneumonia with no or limited local bacterial replication was frequently obtained in mouse models. Direct instillation into the trachea or intranasal inoculation of the bacterial suspension are the techniques used to induce the infection in most of the preclinical models of pneumonia developed to date. More recently, the oropharyngeal aspiration procedure has been widely described in the literature for a variety of purposes including pathogens administration. Aim of this study was to compare the oropharyngeal aspiration technique to the intranasal inoculation and intratracheal instillation in the ability of inducing a consistent lung infection with two MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates in immunocompromised mice. Moreover, pneumonia obtained by bacteria administration with two out of three techniques, intratracheal and oropharyngeal, was characterised in terms of histopathology of pulmonary lesions, biomarkers of inflammation level and leukocytes cells infiltration extent after mice treatment with either vehicle or the antibiotic tigecycline. The data generated clearly showed that both strains were not able to colonize the lungs when inoculated by intranasal route. By contrast, the bacterial load in lungs of mice intratracheally or oropharyngeally infected significantly increased during 26 hours of monitoring, thus highlighting the ability of these strains to generate the infection when directly instilled into the lower respiratory airways. Furthermore, the intragroup variability of mice was significantly reduced with respect to those intranasally administered. Tigecycline was efficacious in lung bacterial load and cytokines release reduction. Findings were supported by semi-quantitative histopathological evaluation of the pulmonary lesions and by inflammatory biomarkers analysis. To conclude, both intratracheal instillation and oropharyngeal aspiration techniques showed to be suitable methods for inducing a robust and consistent pneumonia infection in mice when difficult MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates were used. Noteworthy, oropharyngeal aspiration not requiring specific technical skills and dedicated equipment, was proven to be a safer, easier and faster technique in comparison to the intratracheal instillation.
Insights
This study compared methods for inducing pneumonia in mice using multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Oropharyngeal aspiration and intratracheal instillation effectively created consistent lung infections, unlike intranasal inoculation.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pulmonology
Background:
- Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii causes severe healthcare-associated pneumonia.
- Existing mouse models often yield self-limiting infections, limiting research on MDR A. baumannii pneumonia.
- Standard inoculation methods like intranasal and intratracheal instillation have limitations in reproducibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of oropharyngeal aspiration, intranasal inoculation, and intratracheal instillation in inducing consistent lung infections with MDR A. baumannii in immunocompromised mice.
- To characterize pneumonia induced by intratracheal and oropharyngeal methods, including histopathology, inflammation biomarkers, and leukocyte infiltration.
- To evaluate the therapeutic effect of tigecycline on bacterial load and inflammation.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of three inoculation techniques (intranasal, intratracheal, oropharyngeal) for inducing pneumonia in immunocompromised mice using two MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates.
- Histopathological analysis of lung lesions and measurement of inflammatory biomarkers (cytokines) in infected mice.
- Assessment of tigecycline efficacy on bacterial load and inflammatory markers.
Main Results:
- Intranasal inoculation failed to establish significant lung colonization by MDR A. baumannii.
- Both intratracheal instillation and oropharyngeal aspiration successfully induced robust lung infections with reduced variability.
- Tigecycline treatment effectively reduced bacterial load and cytokine levels in the lungs.
- Histopathological findings correlated with biomarker analysis, confirming lesion severity and inflammatory response.
Conclusions:
- Intratracheal instillation and oropharyngeal aspiration are suitable methods for establishing consistent MDR A. baumannii pneumonia in mouse models.
- Oropharyngeal aspiration is a safer, easier, and faster alternative to intratracheal instillation, requiring less specialized equipment and technical skill.
- These findings provide a reliable preclinical model for studying MDR A. baumannii pneumonia and evaluating novel therapeutics.
More Related Videos
07:43A Non-invasive and Technically Non-intensive Method for Induction and Phenotyping of Experimental Bacterial Pneumonia in Mice
Published on: September 28, 2016
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017