Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
Published on: June 24, 2018
In vitro assessment of polyetheretherketone for an attachment component for an implant-retained overdenture
Geyson Galo da Silva1, Marcos Vinicius Wada Shimano2, Ana Paula Macedo3
1Doctoral student, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Statement Of Problem:
Frequent maintenance because of the limited lifetime of overdenture attachments with O-rings has led to the development of materials that might improve their functionality and longevity. However, testing of newly developed attachment materials is lacking.
Purpose:
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate a newly developed attachment made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for an implant-retained overdenture.
Material And Methods:
Specimens of PEEK, polyacetal, and Teflon O-ring materials were prepared for analysis of roughness, surface hardness, and compressive strength. For the fatigue resistance test, new specimens based on acrylic resin were subjected to 2880 insertion and removal cycles. Compression and roughness data were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post hoc test; hardness data with ANOVA and t test; and fatigue and stereomicroscopy with ANOVA with repeated measures, t test, and Bonferroni adjustment (α=.05).
Results:
Polyacetal had the lowest surface roughness (P=.038). There was a significant difference in hardness among the materials (P<.05). PEEK presented the highest compressive strength among the materials (P<.001). For the fatigue resistance, only polyacetal showed a difference between the initial time-point (P<.05) and subsequent time-points. Polyacetal had a higher fatigue resistance than Teflon (P<.001) and PEEK (P<.05). Regarding the internal deformation of the attachments, a significant difference was observed among the materials (P<.05).
Conclusions:
PEEK showed promising results regarding the physicomechanical properties necessary for use as an overdenture attachment when compared with other evaluated materials. In addition, the PEEK attachment showed results comparable to those in the control group (O-rings) in terms of retention.
