Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Monitoring Lung Function with Electrical Impedance Tomography in the Intensive Care Unit
Published on: September 6, 2024
Three bedside techniques to quantify dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation in mechanically ventilated patients with
L H Roesthuis1, J G van der Hoeven2, C Guérin3
1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Lisanne.Roesthuis@Radboudumc.nl.
Simpler bedside methods for measuring dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation in COPD patients showed low bias but wide agreement limits compared to the reference standard. Airway pressures do not accurately represent end-inspiratory volume (Vei).
Area of Science:
- Pulmonary Physiology
- Mechanical Ventilation
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation (DPH) in COPD patients increases risks like volutrauma and hemodynamic compromise.
- Accurate quantification of DPH via end-inspiratory volume (Vei) is crucial but challenging at the bedside.
- Current reference standard for Vei measurement is cumbersome, necessitating simpler alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of easier bedside methods in reflecting the reference standard for dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation (Vei).
- To compare a ventilator maneuver and a formula-based calculation against the calibrated glass burette reference method for Vei.
Main Methods:
- Vei was measured in 17 COPD patients under controlled mechanical ventilation using three techniques.
- Reference method: passive exhalation into a calibrated glass burette (Veireference).
- Alternative methods: ventilator maneuver (Veimaneuver) and a pressure-volume formula (Veiformula).
Main Results:
- Veireference showed no significant correlation with plateau pressure or intrinsic PEEP, but was inversely related to driving pressure.
- Both Veimaneuver and Veiformula demonstrated low bias but wide limits of agreement when compared to Veireference.
- Repeated measurements of Veireference showed high agreement and correlation, indicating stability of the reference method.
Conclusions:
- Airway pressures are not a reliable indicator of Vei in COPD patients.
- While simpler methods for Vei quantification exhibit low bias, their wide limits of agreement necessitate caution in clinical application.
- Further research may be needed to refine bedside techniques for accurate DPH assessment in COPD.
More Related Videos
08:25Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
Published on: January 8, 2019
06:22Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract II: Inspection
Chest Configuration
The chest configuration...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History