Microsurgical resection versus stereotactic radiosurgery for low-grade intracranial arteriovenous malformations: A...

The role of microsurgery and radiosurgery in the management of low-grade (Spetzler-Martin grade 1 and 2) arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of low-grade AVMs following microsurgery and radiosurgery using a database of AVM patients presenting between 1990 and 2017. Procedure-related complications, obliteration, and functional status at last follow-up were compared between groups. Hemorrhage-free survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis with subgroup analyses by rupture status on presentation. The study involved 233 patients, of which 113 and 120 were treated with microsurgery and radiosurgery, respectively. The complication rates were statistically comparable between both treatment modalities. Mean follow-up time was 5.1 ± 5.2 years. In the complete cohort, there was no significant difference in hemorrhage-free survival between microsurgery and radiosurgery (log-rank p = 0.676, Breslow p = 0.493). When excluding procedure-related hemorrhage and partial resection, hemorrhage-free survival was significantly higher in the surgically treated cohort (log-rank = 0.094, Breslow p = 0.034). The obliteration rate was significantly higher in the surgical cohort (96% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), while functional status was similar. Microsurgery may offer superior hemorrhage-free survival in the early post-treatment period and demonstrates equivalent long-term hemorrhage control and functional outcome at 5 years compared to radiosurgery with nearly complete obliteration rates. Persistent neurologic deficits following microsurgery and symptomatic cerebral edema represent important treatment risks despite low SM grading. Appropriate patient selection even when dealing with low-grade AVMs is advised, as judicious patient selection and emphasis on technical success can minimize procedure-related hemorrhage and the incidence of subtotal resection.