Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Performance of the SSI development function compared with 33 other functions applied to 79 arthropod species'
1Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews Biological Station, 125 Marine Science Drive, St. Andrews, NB, E5B 0E4, Canada; Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, NB, E2L 4L5, Canada.
Abstract:
The development rates of arthropods are temperature-dependent. Studies aiming to predict the dynamics of arachnid, crustacean, and insect populations in nature often require the derivation of development functions representing this phenomenon. A previous study (Quinn, B.K., 2017, J. Therm. Biol. 63, 65-77) identified 33 development functions commonly used in past studies on temperature-dependent development of arthropods, and illustrated that: (1) most of 99 past studies only applied one or few (2-5) development functions to their data without considering others; and (2) most of a subset of 79 studies' data were not fit with the actual best function for them, resulting in sometimes substantial differences in model performance and predictive ability. However, that study did not test the class of development functions based on theoretical enzyme thermodynamics, including the Sharpe-Schoolfield-Ikemoto (SSI) function. Herein, the meta-analyses done in that previous study were redone, after fitting all 79 reanalyzed datasets with the SSI function. Estimates of the intrinsic optimum temperature (TΦ) for development of each tested species were also derived using the SSI function and compared among taxa. Including the SSI function in analyses did not change the conclusions of the previous study concerning development function usage, choice, and consequences. Notably, the SSI function performed as well as or relatively better than other functions of comparable or lower complexity in terms of R2, AICC-based rankings, ΔAICC values, and prediction errors, which may recommend its more widespread use in future studies. Overall differences in TΦ were found among arthropod subphyla, as well as between most species pairs. Most TΦ estimates produced herein were novel, and could be used to make inferences about or comparisons among arthropod taxa in future studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

