Modeling inactivation kinetics for Enterococcus faecium on the surface of peanuts during convective dry roasting
Kaitlyn E Casulli1, Matthew J Igo2, Donald W Schaffner2
1Michigan State University, Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, 524 S. Shaw Ln., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Rutgers University, Department of Food Science, 65 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Abstract:
Dry roasting can reduce Salmonella contamination on peanuts. While previous studies evaluated impact of product temperature, process humidity, product moisture, and/or product water activity on Salmonella lethality, no published study has tested multiple primary and secondary models on data collected in a real-world processing environment. We tested multiple primary and secondary models to quantify Salmonella surrogate, Enterococcus faecium, inactivation on peanuts. Shelled runner-type peanuts inoculated with E. faecium were treated at various air temperatures (121, 149, and 177 °C) and air velocities (1.0 and 1.3 m/s) for treatment times from 1 to 63 min. Peanut surface temperature was measured during treatment. Water activity and moisture content were measured, and E. faecium were enumerated after treatment. Microbial inactivation was modeled as a function of time, product temperature, and product moisture. Parameters (Dref, zT, zaw, zMC, and/or n) were compared between model fits. The log-linear primary model combined with either the modified Bigelow-type secondary model accounting for aw or moisture content showed improved fit over the log-linear primary model combined with the traditional Bigelow-type secondary model. The Weibull primary model combined with the traditional Bigelow-type secondary model had the best fit. All parameter relative errors were less than 15%, and RMSE values ranged from 0.379 to 0.674 log CFU/g. Incorporating either aw or moisture content in the inactivation models did not make a practical difference within the range of conditions and model forms evaluated, and air velocity did not have a significant impact on inactivation. The models developed can aid processors in developing and validating pathogen reduction during peanut roasting.
More Related Videos
10:24Author Spotlight: Quantification of Aflatoxins and Phytoalexins in Peanut Seeds to Identify Genetic Resistance Against Aspergillus
Published on: April 19, 2024
05:55High-throughput, Microscale Protocol for the Analysis of Processing Parameters and Nutritional Qualities in Maize Zea mays L.
Published on: June 16, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Temperature
Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Chemical Agents for Microbial Control
Biological Methods for Microbial Control
E1 Reaction: Kinetics and Mechanism
