Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
Published on: July 12, 2022
Prediction intervals should be included in meta-analyses published in dentistry
Clovis Mariano Faggion1, Max Clemens Menne1, Nikolaos Pandis2
1Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Reporting prediction intervals (PIs) in random effects meta-analysis is crucial for understanding treatment effect heterogeneity. However, PIs are rarely reported in periodontology and implant dentistry meta-analyses, potentially misleading interpretations.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Dental Research
Background:
- Random effects meta-analysis is frequently used in periodontology and implant dentistry.
- Interpretation of random effects meta-analysis results can be misleading if heterogeneity is ignored.
- Prediction intervals (PIs) offer a valuable method to quantify heterogeneity in treatment effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To emphasize the importance of reporting prediction intervals (PIs) in random effects meta-analysis.
- To evaluate the frequency of PI reporting in meta-analyses within periodontology and implant dentistry.
Main Methods:
- Searched PubMed for meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry.
- Selected meta-analyses with at least three trials for primary outcomes.
- Extracted data on meta-analysis model type (fixed or random) and PI inclusion.
Main Results:
- A total of 349 meta-analyses were identified across 94 systematic reviews.
- The random-effects model was used in 75.4% of meta-analyses.
- Only one systematic review reported prediction intervals (PIs).
Conclusions:
- The prevalent lack of PI reporting in periodontology and implant dentistry meta-analyses is concerning.
- Prediction intervals should be routinely included in random effects meta-analyses to accurately convey treatment effect heterogeneity.
- Ignoring heterogeneity can lead to misleading conclusions; PIs provide clinical context for treatment effect variability.
Related Concept Videos
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Confidence Intervals
A...
The Availability Heuristic
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

