Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

05:48
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.9K
Explicating the concept of epistemic rationality
1University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Summary
This study explicates epistemic rationality by considering its normativity and purpose. It proposes an instrumentalist view, suggesting different theories of rationality suit various goals, like guiding or assessing beliefs.
Area of Science:
- Philosophy of Mind
- Epistemology
- Decision Theory
Background:
- Epistemic rationality is central to theories of rationality.
- Characterizing epistemic rationality typically involves conceptual clarification.
- Existing theories often lack a clear consideration of their intended purpose.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explicate the concept of epistemic rationality.
- To highlight the importance of normativity and purpose in rationality theories.
- To propose an instrumentalist framework for understanding rationality.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of epistemic rationality.
- Instrumentalist approach to theories of rationality.
- Focus on the purposes of guiding and assessing doxastic states.
Main Results:
- The normativity and purpose are essential for explicating rationality.
- An instrumentalist position allows for diverse characterizations of rationality.
- Different purposes necessitate different theories of rationality.
Conclusions:
- The explication of rationality should be sensitive to its intended use.
- A pluralistic view of rationality accommodates various theoretical approaches.
- Theories of rationality can be tailored for guiding or assessing doxastic states.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
146
Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are grounded in the belief that our thoughts profoundly influence our emotions and actions. Advocates of CBT emphasize three core assumptions: first, that cognitions are identifiable and measurable; second, that they are central to psychological functioning; and third, that irrational or maladaptive beliefs can be replaced with rational and adaptive ones. This transformative approach to therapy has paved the way for specific models such as Albert...
146
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.3K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.3K
Hindsight Biases
4.0K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.0K
The Availability Heuristic
6.6K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.6K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.5K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.5K

