Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.3K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

303
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
303
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.0K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.0K
Modeling in Therapy01:26

Modeling in Therapy

167
Modeling, a key technique in therapy, uses observational learning to help clients acquire and practice new skills by watching therapists demonstrate desired behaviors. This approach, rooted in Albert Bandura's concept of vicarious learning, plays a significant role in therapeutic interventions for various psychological conditions, including social anxiety, ADHD, and depression.
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
167
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

164
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
164

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantification and visualization of 3D facial aging in individuals of European ancestry.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

The craniofacial shape of modern humans embodies genomic signatures of evolution, diversity, and clinical conditions.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Interpreting SNP heritability in admixed populations.

Genetics·2025
Same author

Clustering individuals using INMTD: a novel versatile multi-view embedding framework integrating omics and imaging data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

Enhanced insights into the genetic architecture of 3D cranial vault shape using pleiotropy-informed GWAS.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Optimized phenotyping of complex morphological traits: enhancing discovery of common and rare genetic variants.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 11, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K

Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Jordan D Lill1, Mark D Shriver1, Keith D Allen1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Munroe-Meyer Institute for Genetics and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5450 USA.

Behavior Analysis in Practice
|December 6, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces the Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision Scheme (SPADS), a new model to help behavior analysts select the best stimulus preference assessment (SPA) procedures. SPADS improves upon existing methods by considering multiple factors for optimal reinforcer identification.

Keywords:
Clinical practiceDecision makingPreference assessment

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.9K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.1K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavior Analysis
  • Applied Behavior Analysis
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) are crucial for identifying effective reinforcers in behavior analysis.
  • Training and application of SPAs are widespread among behavior analysts, as mandated by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB).
  • Existing research and clinical decision-making models for SPA selection have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel decision-making model, the Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision Scheme (SPADS).
  • To address limitations in prior SPA selection models by incorporating a broader range of variables.
  • To enhance the efficacy and context-specificity of SPA procedure selection.

Main Methods:

  • The SPADS model integrates client characteristics, stimulus dimensions, and administration time.
  • It considers the agreement between two potentially effective, context-specific SPA procedures.
  • The model aims to provide a comprehensive framework for selecting appropriate SPAs.

Main Results:

  • The SPADS model offers a more nuanced approach to SPA selection compared to previous methods.
  • It accounts for factors influencing the effectiveness of different SPA procedures.
  • The model facilitates informed decisions for practitioners in applied settings.

Conclusions:

  • The SPADS provides a valuable tool for behavior analysts to optimize the selection of stimulus preference assessment procedures.
  • This systematic approach can lead to more effective identification of reinforcers.
  • SPADS enhances clinical decision-making in applied behavior analysis by considering multiple critical variables.