Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025
Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
Reproducibility and Repeatability of CBCT-Derived Radiomics Features
Hao Wang1,2,3, Yongkang Zhou4, Xiao Wang2
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Purpose:
This study was conducted in order to determine the reproducibility and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiomics features.
Methods:
The first-, second-, and fifth-day CBCT images from 10 head and neck (H&N) cancer patients and 10 pelvic cancer patients were retrospectively collected for this study. Eighteen common radiomics features were extracted from the longitudinal CBCT images using two radiomics packages. The reproducibility of CBCT-derived radiomics features was assessed using the first-day image as input and compared across the two software packages. The site-specific intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to quantitatively assess the agreement between packages. The repeatability of CBCT-based radiomics features was evaluated by comparing the following days of CBCT to the first-day image and quantified using site-specific concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Furthermore, the correlation with volume for all the features was assessed with linear regression and R 2 as correlation parameters.
Results:
The first-order histogram-based features such as skewness and entropy showed good agreement computed in either software package (ICCs ≥ 0.80), while the kurtosis measurements were consistent in H&N patients between the two software tools but not in pelvic cases. The ICCs for GLCM-based features showed good agreement (ICCs ≥ 0.80) between packages in both H&N and pelvic groups except for the GLCM-correction. The GLRLM-based texture features were overall less consistent as calculated by the two different software packages compared with the GLCM-based features. The CCC values of all first-order and second-order GLCM features (except GLCM-energy) were all above 0.80 from the 2-day part test-retest set, while the CCC values all dropped below the cutoff after 5-day treatment scans. All first-order histogram-based and GLCM-texture-based features were not highly correlated with volume, while two GLRLM features, in both H&N and pelvic cohorts, showed R 2 ≥0.8, meaning a high correlation with volume.
Conclusion:
The reproducibility and repeatability of CBCT-based radiomics features were assessed and compared for the first time on both H&N and pelvic sites. There were overlaps of stable features in both disease sites, yet the overall stability of radiomics features may be disease-/protocol-specific and a function of time between scans.
