Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 11, 2025

10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
6.6K
Prospective Phase II Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Mandibular Preservation in Upfront Surgery
Devendra Chaukar1, Kumar Prabash2, Pawan Rane3
1Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Summary
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) shows potential for mandibular preservation in oral cancer patients, achieving this in 47% of cases. Survival rates were similar to surgery alone, though NACT caused significant toxicity.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Chemotherapy
Background:
- Oral cancer treatment often involves extensive surgery, including mandible resection.
- Mandibular preservation is crucial for maintaining quality of life and function.
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is being explored as a strategy to reduce tumor burden and potentially spare the mandible.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of NACT in achieving tumor shrinkage for mandibular preservation in oral cancer.
- To compare the outcomes of NACT followed by surgery with upfront surgical treatment.
- To assess the safety and toxicity profiles of NACT in this context.
Main Methods:
- A single-center, randomized phase II trial was conducted on patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma requiring mandibular resection.
- Patients were randomized to either standard upfront surgery (standard arm) or two cycles of NACT (docetaxel, cisplatin, fluorouracil) followed by surgery (intervention arm).
- The primary endpoint was the rate of mandible preservation, with secondary endpoints including disease-free survival and toxicity.
Main Results:
- Mandibular preservation was achieved in 47% of patients who received NACT.
- Disease-free survival and overall survival rates were similar between the NACT and standard surgery arms.
- While complications were comparable, NACT led to significant chemotherapy-induced toxicities (grade III/IV in 73.6% of patients).
Conclusions:
- NACT demonstrates a potential role in facilitating mandibular preservation for oral cancer patients.
- This approach appears to offer similar survival outcomes compared to conventional surgery without NACT.
- Further validation in larger phase III trials is warranted due to observed toxicities.
