Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

34.4K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
34.4K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

29
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
29
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.5K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.5K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

5.8K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
5.8K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

11.5K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
11.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MRI-Based Volumetric Analysis of the Quadriceps Muscles Correlation With Knee Extension Strength in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

The American journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Changes in Muscle Volume Asymmetries Among Lower Extremity Muscles From Baseline Through 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

A common law power to dissect: a medico-legal history.

Medical law review·2025
Same author

Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Cohort Study.

The American journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Epidemiologic patterns of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis detection and treatment in new york state.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B·2023
Same author

Why I am still not convinced heartbeat bills are defensible.

Bioethics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K

Why Inconsistency Arguments Matter.

Joshua Shaw1

  • 1Penn State Erie, The Behrend College, Erie, PA, USA.

The New Bioethics : a Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body
|December 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Arguments claiming abortion opponents hold inconsistent beliefs are challenged. This paper refutes these challenges, asserting that inconsistency arguments against abortion opponents remain valid and collectively persuasive.

Keywords:
Inconsistency argumentsabortionembryosfetusesin vitro fertilization

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.5K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Political Philosophy

Background:

  • Abortion opponents are frequently accused of holding inconsistent beliefs or priorities.
  • Inconsistency arguments suggest that if opponents were consistent, they would prioritize spontaneous abortions or support social welfare programs more robustly.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the objections raised by Colgrove, Blackshaw, and Rodger against inconsistency arguments concerning abortion opponents.
  • To demonstrate that the objections presented by Colgrove et al. do not invalidate inconsistency arguments as a whole.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the structure and claims of inconsistency arguments regarding abortion opponents.
  • Deconstruction of the Diversity Objection, Other Beliefs Objection, and Other Actions Objection proposed by Colgrove et al.
  • Examination of the counterarguments and their sufficiency in addressing potential criticisms.

Main Results:

  • Colgrove et al.'s objections are based on misrepresentations of inconsistency arguments and their proponents' engagement with counterarguments.
  • The specific objections raised do not demonstrate that inconsistency arguments fail in their entirety.
  • Inconsistency arguments against abortion opponents retain their validity and persuasive force.

Conclusions:

  • The refutation of Colgrove et al.'s objections reaffirms the viability of inconsistency arguments in ethical and political discourse.
  • Further philosophical engagement is needed to fully address the complexities of belief consistency in the abortion debate.
  • The paper supports the continued use of inconsistency arguments to scrutinize the ethical coherence of abortion opponents' positions.