Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

39.8K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
39.8K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

92.3K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
92.3K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
Torts II01:13

Torts II

703
Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
703
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

22
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
22

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bisphenol A Decreases Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity in Normal Weight Adults: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

MRI Coregistered Rodent Histotripsy Array for Orthotopic Liver Models.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
Same author

Aggressive Management of Pulmonary Mucormycosis Necrotizing Fasciitis in a Post-Liver Transplant Patient.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Delayed testing in directed forgetting dissociates active and passive forms of forgetting.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2024
Same author

Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines on Regenerative Medicine Treatment for Chronic Pain: A Consensus Report from a Multispecialty Working Group.

Journal of pain research·2024
Same author

Decision-Making Capacity and Authenticity.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 11, 2025

A Noninvasive Method For In situ Determination of Mating Success in Female American Lobsters Homarus americanus
10:18

A Noninvasive Method For In situ Determination of Mating Success in Female American Lobsters Homarus americanus

Published on: February 7, 2014

11.1K

Should Employment Division v Smith Be Overturned?

Jake Greenblum1, Ryan Hubbard2

  • 1Assistant professor of bioethics at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine in Edinburg.

AMA Journal of Ethics
|December 7, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Religious exemptions for healthcare providers may expand, potentially impacting patient care and legal standards. Overturning established legal precedent could weaken patient protections and the rule of law.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

836
Standardizing a Non-Lethal Method for Characterizing the Reproductive Status and Larval Development of Freshwater Mussels Bivalvia: Unionida
07:22

Standardizing a Non-Lethal Method for Characterizing the Reproductive Status and Larval Development of Freshwater Mussels Bivalvia: Unionida

Published on: October 4, 2019

7.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 11, 2025

A Noninvasive Method For In situ Determination of Mating Success in Female American Lobsters Homarus americanus
10:18

A Noninvasive Method For In situ Determination of Mating Success in Female American Lobsters Homarus americanus

Published on: February 7, 2014

11.1K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

836
Standardizing a Non-Lethal Method for Characterizing the Reproductive Status and Larval Development of Freshwater Mussels Bivalvia: Unionida
07:22

Standardizing a Non-Lethal Method for Characterizing the Reproductive Status and Larval Development of Freshwater Mussels Bivalvia: Unionida

Published on: October 4, 2019

7.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Health Law
  • Religious Freedom

Background:

  • Healthcare professionals and organizations currently possess significant legal protections for religious exemptions.
  • These protections are based on legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's ruling in Employment Division v. Smith (1990).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the potential impact of strengthening religious exemption claims for healthcare providers.
  • To examine the legal and ethical implications of revisiting the precedent set by Employment Division v. Smith.
  • To assess the potential risks to patient safety and the rule of law.

Main Methods:

  • Legal analysis of current case law regarding religious exemptions in healthcare.
  • Examination of the US Supreme Court's docket for relevant cases.
  • Discussion of the potential consequences of overturning or modifying existing legal standards.

Main Results:

  • The US Supreme Court is considering cases that could alter the legal landscape of religious exemptions.
  • Overturning the Smith precedent may lead to an increase in successful religious exemption claims by clinicians.
  • This shift could potentially erode established legal principles and patient protections.

Conclusions:

  • Strengthening religious exemptions for healthcare providers poses a risk to patient care and safety.
  • Modifications to the Smith precedent could undermine the rule of law if not addressed by Congress.
  • Further legislative or judicial action may be necessary to balance religious freedom with patient well-being.