Revisiting trajectories of BMI in youth: An in-depth analysis of differences between BMI and other adiposity measures

Body mass index (BMI) is used to identify trajectories of adiposity in youth, but it does not distinguish fat- from fat-free-mass. There are other inexpensive measures of adiposity which might better capture fat-mass in youth The objective of this study is to examine differences between sex-specific trajectories of BMI and other adiposity indicators (subscapular and triceps skinfold thickness, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio) which may better capture fat-mass in youth.

Data come from four cycles of a longitudinal cohort of 1293 students in Montréal, Canada at ages 12, 15, 17 and 24. Group-based trajectory models identified sex-specific adiposity trajectories among participants with data in ≥3 cycles (n = 417 males; n = 445 females).

There were six trajectory groups in males and females for all five indicators, except for waist circumference (seven) in both sexes and triceps skinfold thickness (four) and waist-to-height ratio (five) in females. Most trajectories indicated linear increases; only the skinfold thickness indicators identified a decreasing trajectory. While all indicators identified a trajectory with high levels of adiposity, they differed in the number and relative size of trajectories pertaining to individuals in lower half of the adiposity distribution.

BMI is a satisfactory indicator of adiposity in youth if the aim of the trajectory analysis is to identify youth with excess adiposity, a known risk factor for cardiometabolic outcomes in adulthood.