Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 10, 2025

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Effects of an Infection Control Protocol for Coronavirus Disease in Emergency Mechanical Thrombectomy
Jin Eun1, Min-Hyung Lee1, Sang-Hyuk Im1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
The COVID-19 protection protocol increased door-to-imaging time for stroke thrombectomy. Optimizing imaging and anesthesia can reduce procedure delays, improving patient outcomes during pandemics.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Public Health
Background:
- The COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns about infection prevention and procedural delays in emergency mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke.
- Neurointerventionists faced challenges adapting protocols to balance patient safety and timely treatment during the pandemic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of modified mechanical thrombectomy protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic on procedure times and patient outcomes.
- To identify key factors influencing procedure delays in acute stroke thrombectomy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 88 patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, comparing pre-COVID-19 conventional protocols (n=45) with COVID-19 protection protocols (n=43).
- Evaluation of key time metrics: last-normal-to-door, first-abnormal-to-door, door-to-imaging, door-to-puncture, and puncture-to-recanalization.
- Multivariate analysis to identify significant predictors of door-to-puncture and total procedure times.
Main Results:
- The COVID-19 protection protocol significantly increased door-to-imaging time (p=0.0257), particularly in suspected COVID-19 cases.
- No significant difference in door-to-puncture time was observed between protocols (p=0.5042).
- Multivariate analysis revealed last-normal-to-door and door-to-imaging times as significant factors affecting door-to-puncture time. Total procedure time was influenced by occlusion site, last-normal-to-door time, door-to-imaging time, and anesthesia type.
Conclusions:
- The COVID-19 protection protocol notably impacted door-to-imaging time.
- Reducing door-to-imaging time and utilizing local anesthesia where feasible are crucial for shortening door-to-puncture and recanalization times.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the multifaceted effects of pandemic-related protection protocols on emergency thrombectomy.
Objective:
Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, neurointerventionists have been increasingly concerned regarding the prevention of infection and time delay in performing emergency thrombectomy procedures in patients with acute stroke. This study aimed to analyze the effects of changes in mechanical thrombectomy protocol before and after the COVID-19 pandemic on procedure time and patient outcomes and to identify factors that significantly impact procedure time.
Methods:
The last-normal-to-door, first-abnormal-to-door, door-to-imaging, door-to-puncture, and puncture-to-recanalization times of 88 patients (45 treated with conventional pre-COVID-19 protocol and 43 with COVID-19 protection protocol) were retrospectively analyzed. The recanalization time, success rate of mechanical thrombectomy, and modified Rankin score of patients at discharge were assessed. A multivariate analysis was conducted to identify variables that significantly influenced the time delay in the door-to-puncture time and total procedure time.
Results:
The door-to-imaging time significantly increased under the COVID-19 protection protocol (p=0.0257) compared to that with the conventional pre-COVID-19 protocol. This increase was even more pronounced in patients who were suspected to be COVID-19-positive than in those who were negative. The door-to-puncture time showed no statistical difference between the conventional and COVID-19 protocol groups (p=0.5042). However, in the multivariate analysis, the last-normal-to-door time and door-to-imaging time were shown to affect the door-to-puncture time (p=0.0068 and 0.0097). The total procedure time was affected by the occlusion site, last-normal-to-door time, door-to-imaging time, and type of anesthesia (p=0.0001, 0.0231, 0.0103, and 0.0207, respectively).
Conclusion:
The COVID-19 protection protocol significantly impacted the door-to-imaging time. Shortening the door-to-imaging time and performing the procedure under local anesthesia, if possible, may be required to reduce the door-to-puncture and doorto- recanalization times. The effect of various aspects of the protection protocol on emergency thrombectomy should be further studied.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism III: Nursing Management

